JISCMail - CCP4BB Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

CCP4BB Archives

October 2010

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	Date	Size
Re: Strange spots	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:41:15 -0000	130 lines
Re: Strange spots	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:46:56 +0000	110 lines
Re: How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:46:20 +0000	27 lines
Re: DNA-protein complex.	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:58:29 +0100	98 lines
DNA-protein complex.	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:06:19 +0800	58 lines
Re: How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:23:22 -0400	77 lines
How to get PDB of small molecule which is not available in data base..??	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:43:10 +0530	30 lines
Re: DLS	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:00:22 +0200	182 lines
Re: DLS	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:10:50 -0500	81 lines
Re: DLS	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:23:59 -0400	118 lines
Re: DLS	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:09:54 -0500	44 lines
Re: Free R with doubled cell edge	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:08:43 -0700	189 lines
Re: Strange spots	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:06:11 -0400	7069 lines
Re: DLS	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:56:31 -0400	103 lines
Re: Free R with doubled cell edge	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:49:40 GMT	358 lines
Re: Free R with doubled cell edge	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:22:36 +0200	229 lines
Re: Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:34:47 +0100	455 lines
Re: Strange spots	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:31:41 +0200	70 lines
Re: Strange spots	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:16:35 +0100	4273 lines
Re: Strange spots - In book of John Helliwell	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:58:19 +0200	627 lines
DLS	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:02:41 +0800	20 lines
Re: resolution limit stuck in Refmac5	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:56:05 -0700	87 lines
resolution limit stuck in Refmac5	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:46:45 -0700	50 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:23:09 -0400	249 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:03:42 -0700	97 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:30:45 -0500	210 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:13:22 -0500	15 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:05:33 -0600	67 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:23:32 +0200	1297 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:29 -0700	9748 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:03:12 +0100	172 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:55:09 -0400	23 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:37:03 -0400	82 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:25:15 -0700	35 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:14:08 +0000	37 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:13:27 +0100	164 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:13:12 -0500	678 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:08:51 -0500	714 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:59:40 -0500	368 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:56:28 -0600	305 lines
Which version CCP4 output DFc colume in SIGMAA?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:56:07 -0400	17 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:49:41 -0400	148 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:10:15 -0500	93 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:01:48 +0100	82 lines
Re: Help with model bias in merihedral twin + Refmac5	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:59:28 -0400	455 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:44:43 +0100	72 lines
Re: Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:41:51 +0100	45 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:36:02 -0400	69 lines
Strange spots	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:08:15 +0100	9737 lines
Re: Real space refinement [was: Against Method (R)]	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:57:37 -0700	73 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:31:16 -0600	182 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:21:42 +0200	212 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:26:03 +0200	238 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:50 +0200	220 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:40 +0100	194 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:01:06 +0200	177 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:30:01 +0200	129 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:46:34 +0200	152 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:41:09 +0200	210 lines
Position as Postdoctoral Research Fellow - in membrane proteins structural biology , Oslo Norway	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:37:45 +0200	556 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:50:32 +0200	328 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:10 +0200	200 lines
POST-DOCTORAL POSITION in STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:24:24 +0100	23 lines
Post-Doctoral Position in Structural Biology	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:14:45 +0900	265 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:59:39 -0400	161 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:56:57 -0500	72 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:40:51 -0500	1689 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:32:04 -0600	67 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:15:08 -0600	365 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:09:00 -0700	201 lines
Re: oligomer ligand building	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:02:59 +0100	98 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:56:44 -0700	573 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:11 -0500	613 lines
Re: oligomer ligand building	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:31:16 +0100	34 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:13:43 -0600	277 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:33:14 -0700	62 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:31:52 -0400	466 lines
Re: oligomer ligand building	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:53:28 +0100	25 lines
oligomer ligand building	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:12:29 -0400	68 lines
Free R with doubled cell edge	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:50:07 +0100	88 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:37:50 +0100	123 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:33:12 -0700	386 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:21:24 -0700	158 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:55:35 +0100	112 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:48:14 -0400	183 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:04:28 -0500	136 lines
Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:18:51 +0100	24 lines
Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:09:23 -0500	129 lines
Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:03:29 +0200	180 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:56:42 +0200	283 lines
Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:55:00 -0400	124 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:50:31 +0200	111 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:21 -0400	106 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:29:31 +0200	110 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:26:39 +0100	173 lines
Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:21:37 +0100	307 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:21:20 -0400	152 lines
Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:09:37 -0400	571 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:00:17 -0500	93 lines
Re: Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:51:19 +0200	86 lines
Re: Bug in c_truncate?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:41:11 +0200	76 lines
Additional band on gel due to his-tag: any references?	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:16:59 +0200	34 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:30:54 +0200	40 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:28:49 +0100	133 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:05:52 +0200	60 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:52:13 +1100	570 lines
Postdoctotal Position in Barcelona (erratum)	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:46:14 +0200	1351 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:12:24 -0500	59 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:58:35 -0500	35 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:22:28 -0700	233 lines
Bug in c_truncate?	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:14:36 -0400	57 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:01:55 -0500	190 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:50:39 -0500	168 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:13:03 -0700	149 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:11:06 -0700	184 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:02:52 -0700	316 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:40:00 -0700	56 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:44 -0700	445 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:20:40 -0400	167 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:56:55 +0200	317 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) - Problems with Publishing	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:53:49 +0200	2828 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:01:27 +0100	136 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:11:36 -0700	96 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:44:21 -0700	64 lines
Re: Hardware question	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:45:28 +0100	107 lines
Postdoctoral Position in Barcelona	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:33:32 +0200	1340 lines
Re: Hardware question	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:25:47 -0700	67 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:34:26 -0400	35 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:28:24 -0500	446 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:04:51 -0400	86 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:22:14 +0100	241 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:56:36 +0100	60 lines
Re: Hardware question	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:43:17 +0100	39 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:38:13 +0100	94 lines
Postdoctoral position in Toulouse, France	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:29:09 +0200	34 lines
Re: Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:43:16 +1100	81 lines
Rules of thumb (was diverging Rcryst and Rfree)	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:29:06 +0200	54 lines
Re: Hardware question	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:48:04 -0400	103 lines
Re: Hardware question	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:26:20 -0400	60 lines
Re: Hardware question	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:14:53 -0400	98 lines
Hardware question	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:52:51 -0400	25 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:28:33 +1100	1416 lines
Help with model bias in merihedral twin	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:00:28 -0400	123 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:15:16 -0700	126 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:46:56 -0700	141 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:45:32 -0500	86 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:45:28 -0700	313 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:31:24 -0700	566 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:21:36 -0600	63 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:45:50 -0400	128 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:31:39 -0400	81 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:59:34 -0700	223 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:50:55 -0500	268 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:47:51 -0400	143 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:31:29 -0500	102 lines
Re: Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:30:41 -0400	125 lines
Help with Optimizing Crystals	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:23:23 -0400	66 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:16:58 +0100	199 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:44:14 +0100	173 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:53:05 -0700	28 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:41:15 +0100	159 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:30:11 -0500	89 lines
Re: Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:28:06 -0700	124 lines
Against Method (R)	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:46:46 -0700	95 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:15:50 +0100	55 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:07:18 +0100	39 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:51:59 +0100	1395 lines
Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:32:45 +0200	243 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:00:34 +0100	50 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:52:38 +0100	175 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:37:01 -0400	35 lines
Re: rigorously compatible coordinate files	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:26:17 +0100	24 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:20:53 +0100	50 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:06:16 +0100	93 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:04:57 +0100	41 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction / comment for imperfect models	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:38:33 +0000	180 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:16:31 +0000	222 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:38:56 -0700	160 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:33:47 +1100	538 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:45:06 -0500	154 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:07:02 -0700	159 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:36:18 -0500	60 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:54:46 -0700	40 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:16:28 -0600	16 lines
Re: diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:44:31 -0400	66 lines
diverging Rcryst and Rfree	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:10:06 -0400	17 lines
Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:16:17 -0700	158 lines
message for CCP4bb	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:43:55 +0100	159 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:04:15 +0100	115 lines
FW: [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:09:52 +0100	454 lines
Re: [OT]:Android	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:43:37 -0700	24 lines
[OT]:Android	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:41:09 -0700	48 lines
Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 00:21:26 +0100	52 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:14:16 -0700	91 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:05:15 -0700	97 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:29:46 -0700	95 lines
Re: R-free flag problem	Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:55:14 +0800	193 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:53:32 -0700	64 lines
RE : [ccp4bb] Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:04:46 +0000	30 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:38:07 -0700	86 lines
Re: Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:17:53 -0700	98 lines
AKTA FPLC system available [off-topic]	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:12:52 +0100	17 lines
Babinet solvent correction [WAS: R-free flag problem]	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:01:49 -0400	26 lines
Diamond MX BAG Training	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:29:37 +0100	380 lines
Re: R-free flag problem	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:07:48 -0400	144 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:16:08 +0100	150 lines
coot-0.5.2-osx-universal.dmg.gz	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:14:33 +0200	15 lines
Re: R-free flag problem	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:37:13 +0200	155 lines
Re: R-free flag problem	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:33:03 +0800	140 lines
Re: update--degradation of MBP fusion protein	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:06:53 -0700	19 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:45:34 +0100	130 lines
Re: Possible spamcryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:34:27 -0400	424 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:03:21 -0700	93 lines
Re: Possible spamcryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:48:00 -0400	210 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:43:31 +0100	163 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:00:38 +0100	111 lines
Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:43:03 -0700	87 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:38:55 -0500	60 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:24:57 +0100	44 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400	63 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:19:05 +0100	69 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:10:59 -0400	25 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:59:49 +0100	74 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:58:37 -0500	41 lines
Re: tlsanl NOW ALSO REFMAC and phenix TLS results	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:27:24 +0100	64 lines
Re: Possible spamcryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:17:07 -0400	211 lines
Re: Possible spamcryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:07:04 -0400	103 lines
Fwd: [ccp4bb] tlsanl NOW ALSO REFMAC and phenix TLS results	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:00:59 -0400	22 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:57:33 -0400	141 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:53:00 -0700	112 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:51:50 -0700	150 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:34:58 -0500	305 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:18:31 -0400	100 lines
Re: Possible spamcryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:13:49 -0700	70 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:57:19 +0100	68 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:55:45 -0700	191 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:46:23 -0700	80 lines
Re: tlsanl NOW ALSO REFMAC and phenix TLS results	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:42:10 +0100	85 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:36:51 +0100	50 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:31:51 +0200	100 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:04:36 -0400	52 lines
Re: tlsanl NOW ALSO REFMAC and phenix TLS results	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:55:38 -0400	46 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:28:10 +0000	74 lines
Re: tlsanl and phenix TLS results	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:01:35 +0100	54 lines
tlsanl and phenix TLS results	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:26:38 -0400	34 lines
Re: Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:12:26 +0200	47 lines
Regarding space group P1, P21	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:05:42 +0100	38 lines
Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:01:00 +0100	73 lines
Biological Structures Group BCA Winter Meeting - Wed 15th December, University of Reading - REGISTRATION NOW OPEN!	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:39:03 +0100	194 lines
Re: FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:51:43 +0100	29 lines
Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:48:51 +0100	44 lines
Re: R-free flag problem.	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:41:30 +0200	96 lines
cryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:42 +0200	43 lines
Re: molecule on symmetry axis	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:26:24 -0400	38 lines
R-free flag problem.	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:50:04 +0800	64 lines
update--degradation of MBP fusion protein	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:12:34 -0700	77 lines
Possible spamcryoprotetant for 35% Dioxane	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:00:51 -0700	59 lines
FOM: Phaser vs SigmaA	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:58:34 -0700	19 lines
Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:50:24 -0600	148 lines
Re: refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:34:08 +0200	101 lines
refining structures with engineered disulfide bonds	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:40:42 -0400	81 lines
Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:15:37 +0200	206 lines
Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ? - solved	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:04:41 -0400	73 lines
Re: Cys auxotroph	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:00:45 +0100	165 lines
Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:26:49 +0200	91 lines
Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:13:09 +0000	56 lines
Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:59:44 +0200	89 lines
Re: Refinement	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:56:32 +0100	40 lines
Re: deposition related question	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:54:31 +0200	73 lines
Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:07:07 +0200	60 lines
deposition related question	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:09:07 +0530	26 lines
Re: what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:26:44 +0900	36 lines
what package provides libg2c.so.0 on Ubuntu ?	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:05:32 -0400	27 lines
Re: help with pymol error message	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:40:13 -0500	76 lines
Re: help with pymol error message	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:16:41 -0400	108 lines
help with pymol error message	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:56:58 -0400	57 lines
Re: Cys auxotroph	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:04:13 +0100	70 lines
Re: JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:39:17 -0400	251 lines
Re: JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:33:01 -0600	293 lines
Re: Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:00:06 +0200	495 lines
Reg. PATCH-ERR in CNS	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:44:55 +0800	378 lines
Re: Refinement	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:15:16 +0200	54 lines
Re: Milch and Minor	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:51:44 -0700	42 lines
JAC (2010), 43,1242-1249	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:34:28 -0400	62 lines
Re: Milch and Minor	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:24:11 -0400	127 lines
Re: Milch and Minor	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:15:47 -0700	39 lines
Milch and Minor	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:05:06 -0700	32 lines
Re: Refinement	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:36:29 -0400	81 lines
Re: Refinement	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:46:18 -0400	134 lines
Refinement	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:39:26 +0100	26 lines
Positions available	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:36:24 +0900	40 lines
Re: Cys auxotroph	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:01:12 +0200	57 lines
Positions available	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:39:29 +0900	74 lines
Positions available	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:33:03 +0900	74 lines
Takeda San Diego, Scientist, Membrane Protein Chemistry	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:58:04 -0500	56 lines
CNIO International PhD and Postdoctoral Programmes_2011 call	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:03:27 +0200	300 lines
Re: Cys auxotroph	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:27:13 +0100	19 lines
Cys auxotroph	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:05:06 -0400	48 lines
Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:29:43 +0100	83 lines
Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:41:44 -0600	979 lines
Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:33:47 -0500	166 lines
Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:05:24 +0100	118 lines
Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:47:49 -0400	51 lines
Re: Question regarding S-SAD	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:28:03 +0100	93 lines
Re: Question regarding S-SAD	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:11:51 +0200	75 lines
Question regarding S-SAD	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:03:53 +0200	29 lines
Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:02:03 +0200	38 lines
Re: que fem sobre això miquel? es veu que l'Esther Cid en el seu dia ja ho va enviar.	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:20:11 +0200	223 lines
Re: crystal growth	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:15:45 +0200	40 lines
Re: Reindexing scaled data	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:12:12 +0100	75 lines
Re: Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:09:04 +0100	48 lines
Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:05:54 +0100	39 lines
Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:53:12 +0200	70 lines
Positions available at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) - Japan	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:23:49 +0900	68 lines
Re: peculiar twinning case	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:55:53 +0100	98 lines
Re: Reindexing scaled data	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:46:07 -0700	43 lines
Re: Reindexing scaled data	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:45:09 -0400	118 lines
Reindexing scaled data	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:34:44 +0100	31 lines
Big difference between anomalous map and density modification map	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:29:12 -0500	36 lines
Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:23:27 +0100	15 lines
coot color question	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:22:27 -0400	17 lines
Re: Pseudo-symmetry/refinement	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:03:47 +0200	39 lines
Pseudo-symmetry/refinement	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:48:30 -0400	84 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:04:14 +0200	182 lines
Re: molecule on symmetry axis	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 23:07:08 +0200	96 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:17:12 +0100	221 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:14:22 -0400	388 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:45:50 -0700	23 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:32:34 +0100	251 lines
Re: molecule on symmetry axis	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:44:59 -0700	85 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:22:59 -0400	93 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:36:13 -0700	22 lines
Re: How to add water molecules..??	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:35:41 +0200	39 lines
How to add water molecules..??	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:58:37 +0530	25 lines
Re: update REFMAC	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:24:26 GMT	235 lines
Re: molecule on symmetry axis	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:55:59 +0200	165 lines
Re: molecule on symmetry axis	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:25:47 +0200	92 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:50:56 +0200	211 lines
Re: crystal growth	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 04:56:23 +0100	14 lines
Re: update REFMAC	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:45:27 -0400	56 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:55:54 +0100	159 lines
Re: molecule on symmetry axis	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:41:06 +0200	53 lines
molecule on symmetry axis	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:28:52 -0400	61 lines
peculiar twinning case	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:08:09 -0400	69 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:23:36 -0600	59 lines
Re: crystal growth	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:58:21 -0700	15 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:41:45 -0700	28 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:14:59 -0700	49 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:07:24 -0400	13 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:44:15 -0600	50 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:42 -0600	45 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:11:48 -0400	190 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:04:59 -0700	34 lines
Re: Source for trimethyl lead acetate	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:58:11 +0200	64 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:43:38 -0500	19 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:37:19 -0500	48 lines
Re: quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:27:37 -0700	34 lines
Source for trimethyl lead acetate	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:54:42 -0400	13 lines
update REFMAC	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:08:55 -0400	30 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:51:59 -0400	42 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:44:33 -0700	70 lines
Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:43:06 -0400	60 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:40:57 +0100	96 lines
quantum diffraction	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:37:11 -0700	63 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:30:16 -0400	113 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:25:41 -0500	20 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:17:59 -0400	158 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:14:22 -0700	25 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:37:56 +0200	56 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:20:04 -0400	154 lines
Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:22:27 -0400	77 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:56:35 -0400	30 lines
Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:54:59 +0100	39 lines
Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:26:37 +0100	49 lines
spread out. .	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:23:32 +0200	42662 lines
spread out	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:23:32 +0200	42661 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:33:53 -0700	49 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:27:48 -0700	71 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another) - Counting statistics	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:50:11 +0200	63 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:47:23 -0700	34 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:45:32 -0400	22 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:43:09 -0400	31 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:42:18 +0200	61 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:31:09 +0200	114 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:28:26 -0500	69 lines
Re: inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:04:57 +0100	64 lines
inflated BOND_RMSD with external restraints (refmac)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:51:38 -0400	38 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:43:50 -0700	231 lines
Faculty Position, Dept of Molecular Biology, Princeton University	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:33:29 -0400	36 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:18:04 -0600	64 lines
RE : [ccp4bb] vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:45:41 +0000	27 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:34:44 -0700	374 lines
Re: [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:12:18 -0700	1384 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:13:49 -0700	301 lines
NUVISION 60GX glasses/emitters	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:59:21 -0400	29 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:41:17 -0700	938 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:38:39 -0400	29 lines
Webinar -- "Scientific inquiry, inference and critical reasoning in the macromolecular crystallography curriculum"	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:28:06 -0500	66 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:23:27 -0500	20 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:17:42 -0600	314 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:14:46 -0700	115 lines
Sweet and discreet tweets about helices and sheets - @PDBeurope	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:10:19 +0200	33 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:59:34 -0500	257 lines
Re: Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:39:45 -0700	67 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:28:48 -0700	219 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:11:50 -0700	90 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:58:23 +0100	129 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:52:22 +0200	109 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:22:15 -0400	84 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:21:19 -0700	56 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:14:42 +0200	89 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:03:26 +0100	77 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:02:54 +0200	178 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:47:40 +0200	63 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:40:09 -0400	31 lines
Re: vector and scalars	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:22:59 -0400	151 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:48:00 +0100	170 lines
Re: Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:30:31 +0200	91 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:24:20 +0200	156 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:34:30 +0100	108 lines
Problem installing CCP4 on MacOSX behind firewall?	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:20:17 +0100	37 lines
Re: cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:16:02 +0100	62 lines
Re: protein ligand energy	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:57:50 +0100	114 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:41:20 +0200	63 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:38:07 -0700	195 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:01:19 -0700	591 lines
Re: crystal growth	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:43:45 +0100	23 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:07:04 -0700	34 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:42:31 -0500	156 lines
Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:10:06 -0700	152 lines
crystal growth	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:41:15 +0100	28 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:27:03 -0700	418 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:02:28 -0700	248 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:51:21 -0700	31 lines
Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:50:38 +0000	104 lines
embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (another)	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:21:15 -0500	109 lines
Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:05:49 -0400	369 lines
	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:03:48 -0400	46 lines
Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:55:56 +0100	410 lines
Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:46:21 -0400	201 lines
Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:41:17 -0400	328 lines
Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:18:05 -0700	358 lines
Re: Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:09:44 +0200	168 lines
Summary : [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:58:56 -0700	83 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:57:33 -0400	75 lines
Re: Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:51:57 +0100	166 lines
Re: twinning and refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:45:56 +0100	77 lines
twinning and refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:33:02 -0500	56 lines
cad, freerflag, uniqueify : free set when making anomalous from merged data	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:07:35 -0400	32 lines
Re: "CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error"	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:52:08 +0100	17 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:50:30 -0500	77 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:31:19 -0700	55 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:30:30 +0200	100 lines
Re: embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:28:27 -0700	80 lines
embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:48:00 -0700	46 lines
Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:01:55 -0400	125 lines
Re: protein ligand energy	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:35:51 +0100	87 lines
Re: protein ligand energy	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:15:47 +0100	59 lines
Re: protein ligand energy	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:13:14 -0700	63 lines
Re: Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:08:34 -0400	60 lines
Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:28:42 -0500	56 lines
Re: Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0200	56 lines
Re: protein ligand energy	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:30:09 +0100	40 lines
Re: Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:00:42 +0100	40 lines
Re: protein ligand energy	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:56:48 +0200	41 lines
Fwd: [ccp4bb] Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:49:53 +0200	45 lines
protein ligand energy	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:43:49 +0100	50 lines
Fill map/mask with dummy atoms?	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:00:32 +0200	34 lines
Re: Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:51:44 -0700	262 lines
Need suggestions for protein: ligand ratio for co-crystallization	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:09:04 -0400	73 lines
New Free Molecular Graphics and Presentation Software	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:58:47 -0700	71 lines
"CCP4i has no longer control of the current database error"	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:44:08 +0100	29 lines
Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:56:04 +0200	67 lines
Re: Lousy diffraction at home but fantastic at the synchrotron?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:04:05 -0700	111 lines
Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:08:09 -0400	228 lines
FW: please post	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:03:27 -0500	672 lines
Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:49 -0400	52 lines
Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:00:05 -0400	253 lines
Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:03:55 -0700	148 lines
Re: I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:40:41 +0100	42 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:32:09 +0200	72 lines
I really need a file(such as .pdb) contains pseudo tanslation	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:19:47 +0800	46 lines
Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:48:54 +0200	145 lines
Re: which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:46:10 +0200	112 lines
which Linux workstation for crystallography to buy?	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:28:28 +0200	121 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:43:17 +0100	274 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:12:04 -0500	236 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:05:11 +0100	317 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:31:24 +0200	89 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:43 -0700	146 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:04:49 +0200	196 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:52:03 -0700	28 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:50:53 -0700	58 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:38:51 +0200	296 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:31:13 -0700	28 lines
Fluorometers	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:07:14 +0000	45 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:48:15 -0700	216 lines
Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:01:10 +0200	159 lines
Re: Refmac TLS plus experimental phase refinement failed	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:50:10 -0700	183 lines
Beamtime @ SLS	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:30:11 +0200	206 lines
1 POSTDOCTORAL POSITION Biochemistry/Molecular Biology/Structural Biology	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:01:17 +0200	81 lines
	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:28:56 +0300	50 lines
	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:34:06 -0000	54 lines
Re: Too many microcrystals.......	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:24:30 -0500	126 lines
Re: Too many microcrystals.......	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:49:18 -0500	328 lines
Re: Too many microcrystals.......	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:23:09 +0200	80 lines
Re: Too many microcrystals.......	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:41:21 -0400	129 lines
Too many microcrystals.......	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 06:15:44 -0000	59 lines
[OFF-TOPIC] Science is Vital.	Sat, 9 Oct 2010 07:02:38 +0100	52 lines
Re: Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2	Sat, 9 Oct 2010 00:36:24 +0100	38 lines
Differences between refmac_5.5 and refmac_5.2	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:15:23 -0400	21 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:48:02 -0400	126 lines
unknown ligand density	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:27:23 -0700	69 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:20:39 -0400	80 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:10:37 +0200	61 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:27:10 -0700	58 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:01:29 -0400	48 lines
Call for applications to the Membrane Protein Lab at Diamond	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:12:16 +0100	400 lines
Re: Detergent and globular proteins	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:37:56 +0200	115 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 00:32:40 -0500	53 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:18:54 -0500	50 lines
Re: Removing a tight binding ligand	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:13:52 +0100	44 lines
Removing a tight binding ligand	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:05:12 -0400	39 lines
Director of Eukaryotic Protein Production	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:56:07 -0400	68 lines
postdoc position in cryo-EM method development	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:47:58 +0100	54 lines
Re: Detergent and globular proteins	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:57:27 +0200	183 lines
Detergent and globular proteins	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 01:27:04 +0530	54 lines
Postdoctoral positions available	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:23:55 -0500	37 lines
Re: Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:14:10 -0700	47 lines
Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:37:20 -0500	49 lines
Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:07:43 -0500	32 lines
Re: Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:55:22 -0400	30 lines
No TABFUN in Amore	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:29:50 +0100	34 lines
Re: Zalman	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:34:08 +0200	33 lines
Re: Zalman	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:30:52 +0100	30 lines
Is the Rmerge invalidate by twinned data?	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:28:34 +0200	17 lines
Re: stereo (again - sigh)	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:23:22 +0200	101 lines
Re: Zalman	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:07:56 +0530	29 lines
Re: stereo (again - sigh)	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:14:03 -0400	80 lines
Re: stereo (again - sigh)	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:21:04 +0200	84 lines
Re: stereo (again - sigh)	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:37:07 +0000	66 lines
Re: stereo (again - sigh)	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:25:16 -0400	41 lines
stereo (again - sigh)	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:11:19 -0400	42 lines
Re: met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain?	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:29:35 +0200	99 lines
met auxotroph S.cerevisiae strain?	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:47:21 +0300	32 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:33:16 -0400	56 lines
Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:34:54 +0200	76 lines
Fwd: [ccp4bb] Summary: measure detergent concentration	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:57:57 -0400	153 lines
Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:34:30 -0700	17 lines
Re: shape complementarity	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:26:45 +1100	74 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:03:53 +0100	25 lines
Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:04:06 +0200	52 lines
Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:48:53 -0500	56 lines
Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:21:50 +0200	69 lines
Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:25:20 -0700	68 lines
Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:50:43 +0200	258 lines
Re: Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:34:10 +0100	58 lines
Radiation damage with crystals containing metal centers (TaBr people chime in?)	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:28:35 -0600	49 lines
Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:24:27 +0200	70 lines
Postdoctoral Position Available	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:14:13 +0100	42 lines
Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:09:26 -0400	184 lines
Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:55:23 -0400	65 lines
Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:42:37 -0400	140 lines
Re: How to detect the concentration of detergent?	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:42:25 +0100	67 lines
Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:35:02 +0000	20 lines
How to detect the concentration of detergent?	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:28:44 +0200	79 lines
shape complementarity	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:01:19 +0100	55 lines
Re: Twinned data	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:55:15 -0400	259 lines
Re: Twinned data	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:40:26 -0400	141 lines
Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:05:30 +0000	18 lines
Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:32:20 +0100	33 lines
Re: Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:32:16 +0100	42 lines
Coot cannot read mtz or pdb files	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:15:56 +0000	1522 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:50:37 +0200	110 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:27:10 +0100	52 lines
Re: mol rep help needed	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:54:06 +0100	47 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:47:43 +0100	46 lines
Postdoctoral position in membrane protein crystallography at Vanderbilt University	Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:52:54 -0500	118 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:34:44 +0200	110 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:15:38 +0100	37 lines
Re: mol rep help needed	Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:10:06 +0100	73 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:57:02 +0200	145 lines
Re: R factor & R free struck	Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:09:16 +0200	89 lines
R factor & R free struck	Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:56:18 -0700	51 lines
Re: .cv to .mtz conversion	Sat, 2 Oct 2010 22:55:58 -0400	25 lines
Re: mol rep help needed	Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:59:33 -0700	129 lines
New home for Science, Nature, Phys.Rev.B.	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:18:22 -0700	40 lines
Re: Twinned data	Sat, 2 Oct 2010 00:35:09 +0200	78 lines
Job Opening Announcement	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:47:02 -0400	36 lines
Re: Zalman	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:05:09 -0700	64 lines
Twinned data	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:18:02 -0400	53 lines
open positions in protein engineering at UCSF	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:12:42 -0700	48 lines
Re: Zalman	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:51:36 +0200	71 lines
Zalman	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:57:07 -0700	129 lines
Re: unknown density	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:55:05 +0200	105 lines
mol rep help needed	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:40:13 -0400	50 lines
Re: unknown density	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:21:31 +0200	136 lines
Re: unknown density	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:38:53 -0300	61 lines
Re: unknown density	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:20:00 +0200	74 lines
unknown density	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:12:12 -0300	166548 lines
Intensive 2-day School in Biological and Chemical Crystallography	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:57:15 +0100	29 lines
Crystal Caves Sun Oct 10 Nat Geo	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:36:12 -0700	32 lines

CCP4BB Archives

October 2010

Options

Subject

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives