|
|
|
Size
|
Re: What solution do you use?
|
James Matthews |
Fri, 28 May 2010 13:15:05 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: What do we already have that *could* manage reading lists?
|
Owen Stephens |
Fri, 28 May 2010 11:07:50 +0100 |
161 lines |
|
Andrew Bate |
Fri, 28 May 2010 10:29:51 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: What do we already have that *could* manage reading lists?
|
Andy Ekins |
Fri, 28 May 2010 10:28:30 +0100 |
224 lines |
Re: What do we already have that *could* manage reading lists?
|
Murr, Cathy |
Fri, 28 May 2010 10:12:31 +0100 |
493 lines |
Reading lists
|
Peter Ebrey |
Fri, 28 May 2010 09:49:41 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: What do we already have that *could* manage reading lists?
|
Paul Stainthorp |
Fri, 28 May 2010 09:49:23 +0100 |
178 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Burke, Russell |
Fri, 28 May 2010 09:43:03 +0100 |
95 lines |
Re: What do we already have that *could* manage reading lists?
|
Andy Ekins |
Fri, 28 May 2010 09:26:08 +0100 |
120 lines |
What do we already have that *could* manage reading lists?
|
Brown A.T. |
Fri, 28 May 2010 08:55:24 +0100 |
260 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Andrew Brown |
Fri, 28 May 2010 08:46:17 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Annette Moore |
Thu, 27 May 2010 23:55:05 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Michael Gonzalez |
Fri, 28 May 2010 08:19:58 +1000 |
137 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Rachael Morgan |
Thu, 27 May 2010 17:33:09 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Lake, Christina |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:59:07 +0100 |
354 lines |
Free event - Innovations in Reference Management, including some reading list stuff
|
Owen Stephens |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:51:35 +0100 |
107 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Paul Stainthorp |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:45:44 +0100 |
84 lines |
|
William Robley |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:37:51 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
TAYLORSON B. |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:28:25 +0100 |
279 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Hannah Young |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:15:18 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Sandra Cockburn |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:08:40 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Andy Bussey |
Thu, 27 May 2010 15:54:42 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
John Salter |
Thu, 27 May 2010 15:14:32 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Jon Knight |
Thu, 27 May 2010 15:10:42 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Cross, Richard |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:58:33 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: What solution do you use?
|
Katie Bennett |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:57:03 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Paul Stainthorp |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:49:57 +0100 |
175 lines |
What solution do you use?
|
Owen Stephens |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:46:52 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Masud Khokhar |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:37:17 +0100 |
135 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Roger Emery |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:26:56 +0100 |
159 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Andy Forbes |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:20:08 +0100 |
151 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Andy Ekins |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:13:19 +0100 |
141 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Hannah Young |
Thu, 27 May 2010 14:06:08 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Paul Stainthorp |
Thu, 27 May 2010 13:56:24 +0100 |
115 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
Michael Gonzalez |
Thu, 27 May 2010 21:31:32 +1000 |
55 lines |
Re: Dead links in reading lists
|
O.Stephens |
Thu, 27 May 2010 11:00:22 +0100 |
175 lines |
Dead links in reading lists
|
Rachael Morgan |
Thu, 27 May 2010 10:18:41 +0100 |
46 lines |