JISCMail - CCP4BB Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

CCP4BB Archives

August 2007

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure	Eric Liu	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:44:02 -0700	88 lines
Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure	Fan, Hai-fu	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:07:40 +0800	87 lines
difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Klemens Wild	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:35:57 +0200	25 lines
Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:36:13 +0100	97 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:51:07 +0100	42 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	David J. Schuller	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:10:02 -0400	41 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Kay Diederichs	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:18:29 +0200	120 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Peter Adrian Meyer	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:18:40 -0400	39 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Bart Hazes	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:22:21 -0600	102 lines
Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure	Peter Adrian Meyer	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:34:42 -0400	35 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	George M. Sheldrick	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:06:47 +0200	122 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Kay Diederichs	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:07:57 +0200	136 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Bart Hazes	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:37:13 -0600	91 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Kevin Jude	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:29:13 -0700	36 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	James Holton	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:47:08 -0600	53 lines
Re: pdb-l: Stop the new PDB format!	Joe Krahn	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:50:16 -0400	53 lines
Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure	Eric Liu	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:55:38 -0700	99 lines
Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure	Anastassis Perrakis	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:03:56 +0200	148 lines
PDB format survey?	Joe Krahn	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:10:45 -0400	28 lines
pseudo-translation vectors in molrep vs other programs	Savvas Savvides	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:46:38 +0200	90 lines
Re: pdb-l: Stop the new PDB format!	Frances C. Bernstein	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:48:57 -0400	112 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Ethan Merritt	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:06:14 -0700	82 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Thomas Stout	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:31:03 -0700	277 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Jon Wright	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 00:58:58 +0200	18 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Joe Krahn	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:17:21 -0400	47 lines
Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms	Bret Church	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:57:23 +1000	95 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Bernhard Rupp	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:07:26 -0700	113 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Kevin Cowtan	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:20:35 +0100	44 lines
imgCIF workshops at BSR 2007	Herbert J. Bernstein	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:45:15 -0400	49 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Joe Krahn	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:10:44 -0400	72 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	George M. Sheldrick	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:14:35 +0200	100 lines
Postdoctoral Position for PHENIX development	Paul D. Adams	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:47:16 -0700	84 lines
stacking interaction!	Sreeram Mahesh	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:18:35 +0530	38 lines
Postdoctoral Position in USC Los Angeles	Lin Chen	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:34:33 -0700	27 lines
Molrep question	Cynthia Czyrphony	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:59:12 +0200	33 lines
Re: stacking interaction!	Robert Immormino	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:23:27 -0400	995 lines
Re: stacking interaction!	Anthony Addlagatta	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:49:38 -0700	73 lines
Biophysicist (SAXS, crystallography) position at LBNL, SF Bay Area	Amy Pagsolingan	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:16:53 -0700	267 lines
density histogram	Bernhard Rupp	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:52:01 -0700	25 lines
Re: density histogram	Peter Zwart	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:23:59 -0700	146 lines
Re: density histogram	Adam Ralph	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:05:40 +0100	30 lines
Re: stacking interaction!	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:07:09 +0100	38 lines
Re: stacking interaction!	Kim Henrick	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:10:00 +0100	103 lines
some resources for working with new pdbv3 format	Robert Immormino	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:30:25 -0400	55 lines
Volume calculation of a crevice	Enrique Rudiño-Piñera	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:53:41 -0500	40 lines
resolution vs ramachandran	Xiaofei Jia	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:30:49 -0700	34 lines
Re: resolution vs ramachandran	Edward Berry	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:44:30 -0700	48 lines
Re: Volume calculation of a crevice	Murray, James W	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:52:50 +0100	146 lines
Re: resolution vs ramachandran	<>	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:00:46 -0500	61 lines
Re: resolution vs ramachandran	Robert Immormino	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:36:13 -0400	49 lines
Re: Volume calculation of a crevice	Anthony Addlagatta	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:02:51 -0700	38 lines
Tweaking with SCBUlk and BBULk parameters in refmac	Jose Antonio Cuesta-Seijo	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:49:26 -0400	55 lines
Job: RNA Center in Santa Cruz, CA, US	William Scott	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:21:38 -0700	54 lines
Calculating vertical offset of helices	Jie Liu	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:10:24 -0400	21 lines
Systems Biology Session: Diamond User Meeting 2007	Brandao-Neto, J (Jose)	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:02:13 +0100	305 lines
Re: Tweaking with SCBUlk and BBULk parameters in refmac	Eleanor Dodson	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:08:37 +0100	75 lines
Hg rippled summary	Klemens Wild	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:26:25 +0200	35 lines
Re: Calculating vertical offset of helices	Eleanor Dodson	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:41:06 +0100	44 lines
Dnase activity in E. coli expressed his tag proteins	Narayanan Ramasubbu	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:12:46 -0400	26 lines
Bruker Microstar-H with Helios optics and MarDTB	praveen kumar	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:29:38 -0700	32 lines
Re: Calculating vertical offset of helices	Edward Berry	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:19:46 -0700	57 lines
Re: Calculating vertical offset of helices	Jie Liu	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:10:54 -0400	92 lines
Re: Dnase activity in E. coli expressed his tag proteins	<>	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:19:25 -0400	52 lines
J. Struct. Biology EndNote style	<>	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:21:48 -0400	22 lines
speeding crystallisation	Neeraj	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:50:30 -0400	30 lines
Re: Dnase activity in E. coli expressed his tag proteins	Filip Van Petegem	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:54:06 -0700	84 lines
slab command of Windows povscript	brenda obrien07	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:00:19 -0500	43 lines
Re: speeding crystallisation	<>	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:05:34 -0400	59 lines
Re: speeding crystallisation	David J. Schuller	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:14:36 -0400	40 lines
endnote style file found	<>	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:16:45 -0400	16 lines
Re: speeding crystallisation	Christian Biertumpfel	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:16:56 -0400	56 lines
Problem solved! Re: [ccp4bb] Asking help about refmac5?	zhongzhou chen	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:44:16 -0600	157 lines
Re: speeding crystallisation	Zhen Zhang	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:56:21 -0400	60 lines
Postdoctoral Position at UCLA	Duilio Cascio	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:45:41 -0700	138 lines
Re: J. Struct. Biology EndNote style	Ngo Duc Tri	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:04:00 +0700	21 lines
Surface complementarity	Rosemary Harrison	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:43:04 +1000	28 lines
Could anyone get me the HKL2MAP 0.2 sources?	Wim Cossement	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:50:29 +0200	35 lines
AstraZeneca US permanent PX position	Pauptit, Richard A	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:10:12 +0100	25 lines
Re: Surface complementarity	Rizkallah, PJ (Pierre)	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:16:57 +0100	71 lines
needles vs crystals	shivesh kumar	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:15:33 +0530	35 lines
Re: needles vs crystals	Roger Rowlett	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:10:56 -0400	43 lines
highly soluble proteins	Yvonne Leduc	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:17:18 -0600	31 lines
Re: highly soluble proteins	Jack Tanner	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:40:52 -0500	41 lines
Postdoc position: Structural biology of intracellular signalling systems	Clemens Steegborn	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:51:55 +0200	56 lines
Re: needles vs crystals	<>	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:17:40 -0400	131 lines
CCP4 mailing list	Thomas Stout	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:20:01 -0700	90 lines
Re: highly soluble proteins	<>	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:30:48 -0400	57 lines
Re: needles vs crystals	James Pauff	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:37:29 -0700	50 lines
Re: highly soluble proteins	M T	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:10:23 +0200	44 lines
Beam time at X6A NSLS	Stojanoff, Vivian	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:36:47 -0400	36 lines
Merging datasets	Kianoush Sadre-Bazzaz	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:04:56 -0700	32 lines
Position for PSI Knowledgebase development	Paul Adams	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:40:07 -0700	92 lines
Re: highly soluble proteins	Stephen Graham	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:42:03 +0100	81 lines
Re: CCP4 mailing list	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:40:52 +0100	40 lines
Re: Merging datasets	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:52:25 +0100	44 lines
Re: CCP4 mailing list	Michele Lunelli	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:35:24 +0200	20 lines
AMORE_NSOL	Xue-Yuan Pei	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:04 +0100	16 lines
Re: AMORE_NSOL	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:27:26 +0100	30 lines
Re: needles vs crystals	Jens-Christian Navarro Poulsen	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:47:29 +0200	386 lines
mr query	Kolstoe S.E.	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:51:10 +0100	97 lines
Re: mr query	Ian Tickle	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:06:15 +0100	92 lines
Re: highly soluble proteins	Das, Debanu	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:10:41 -0700	127 lines
Re: mr query	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:27:35 +0100	46 lines
refmac5 refinement with PEG400	Craig McElroy	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:10:33 -0400	642 lines
Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400	Kumar, Abhinav	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:20:21 -0700	50 lines
Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400	Craig McElroy	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:26:38 -0400	58 lines
Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400	Manish C Pathak	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:37:02 -0700	61 lines
Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400	Kumar, Abhinav	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:43:49 -0700	89 lines
Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400	Craig McElroy	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:50:14 -0400	220 lines
SUMMARY: highly soluble proteins	Yvonne Leduc	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:19:50 -0600	381 lines
More than 70 TLS groups	Craig Morton	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:54:27 +1000	29 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:47:23 -0700	81 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Ethan A Merritt	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:21:42 -0700	47 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Edward A. Berry	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:39:11 -0700	37 lines
Re: More than 70 TLS groups	Martyn Winn	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:50:42 +0100	48 lines
Re: mr query	Kolstoe S.E.	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:33:47 +0100	116 lines
PhD studentship at University of Groningen, the Netherlands	Andy-Mark Thunnissen	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:29:09 +0200	115 lines
refmac problem in running arp/warp	Tommi Kajander	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:02:02 +0300	82 lines
Re: refmac problem in running arp/warp	Anastassis Perrakis	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:19:57 +0200	70 lines
Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:41:05 +0100	26 lines
Re: mr query	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:43:56 +0100	129 lines
CCP4 web-newsletter 46 (Summer 2007)	Remacle, F (Francois)	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:32:56 +0100	108 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:11:13 -0700	155 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Joe Krahn	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:12:44 -0400	82 lines
adjustable loops, other cryo mounting methods	Bryan W. Lepore	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:01:48 -0500	19 lines
Re: refmac problem in running arp/warp	Roberto Steiner	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:08:49 +0100	113 lines
SAD: Refine against anomalous data	ping sun	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:48:11 -0400	47 lines
SAD: Refine against anomalous data	ping sun	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:55:09 -0400	49 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	ping sun	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 20:37:06 -0400	35 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Warren DeLano	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:49:53 -0700	161 lines
Job offer: Protein Crystallographer (with Ph.D)	Blaesse, Michael	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:46:29 +0200	451 lines
Re: refmac problem in running arp/warp	Tommi Kajander	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:00:58 +0300	57 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:27:16 +0100	60 lines
a question about procheck	Jiamu Du	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:56:06 +0800	54 lines
Re: a question about procheck	Jiamu Du	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:19:44 +0800	112 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Clemens Vonrhein	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:26:58 +0100	80 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Clemens Vonrhein	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:53:05 +0100	116 lines
Re: a question about procheck	Paul Emsley	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:09:43 +0100	99 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	George M. Sheldrick	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:12:52 +0200	98 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Kevin Cowtan	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:19:59 +0100	20 lines
technical position: protein expression for structural biology	Emsley Jonas	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:37:06 +0100	68 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Clemens Vonrhein	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:01:00 +0100	135 lines
New buccaneer...	Kevin Cowtan	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:42:38 +0100	38 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Warren DeLano	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:10:49 -0700	204 lines
PDB format survey?	Santarsiero, Bernard D.	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:17:05 -0500	218 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Warren DeLano	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:29:21 -0700	263 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Herbert J. Bernstein	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:51:34 -0400	293 lines
libcheck question	Mark A Saper	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:53:58 -0400	94 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Herbert J. Bernstein	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:59:17 -0400	321 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Ethan Merritt	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:06:09 -0700	282 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Warren DeLano	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:13:59 -0700	357 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Ethan Merritt	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:20:13 -0700	47 lines
real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Mike S	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:51:03 -0400	41 lines
Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Pavel Afonine	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:59:29 -0700	52 lines
Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Anastassis Perrakis	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:57:35 +0200	93 lines
Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Pavel Afonine	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:12:23 -0700	35 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:38:16 -0700	52 lines
Re: Spam: Re: [ccp4bb] real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Anastassis Perrakis	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:03:05 +0200	59 lines
Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Pavel Afonine	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:19:38 -0700	79 lines
Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Dale Tronrud	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:40:40 -0700	122 lines
Real & reciprocal space refinements	Michael S. Chapman	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:02:20 -0700	217 lines
Covalent link	Scapin, Giovanna	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:03:36 -0400	88 lines
Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Mike S	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:25:36 -0400	58 lines
Re: a question about procheck	Jiamu Du	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:10:06 +0800	150 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Sanishvili, Ruslan	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:46:53 -0500	60 lines
Re: a question about procheck	Kim Henrick	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:27:45 +0100	105 lines
Re: a question about procheck	Kim Henrick	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:50 +0100	99 lines
Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement	Kay Diederichs	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:39:28 +0200	112 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Herbert J. Bernstein	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:31:25 -0400	419 lines
kappa 180	Bernhard Rupp	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:10:51 -0700	32 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Miller, Mitchell D.	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:41:59 -0700	70 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Ethan A Merritt	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:48:04 -0700	80 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Paul Adams	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:12:28 -0700	62 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	George M. Sheldrick	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:05:17 +0200	99 lines
Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data	Paul Adams	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:25:22 -0700	133 lines
CCP4 rotation convention	Bernhard Rupp	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:37:19 -0700	48 lines
Re: PDB format survey?	Edward A Berry	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:51:17 -0700	36 lines
selfrot plot	Bernhard Rupp	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:06:09 -0700	32 lines
Posts available at EMBL-EBI	Kim Henrick	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:35:29 +0100	29 lines
Re: libcheck question	Eleanor Dodson	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:35:39 +0100	46 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention - long comments	Sacha Urzhumtsev	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:10:33 +0200	130 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Eleanor Dodson	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:11:00 +0100	80 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Ian Tickle	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:42:43 +0100	125 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Ian Tickle	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:10:46 +0100	146 lines
domains missing	Wu, Mousheng	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:38:41 -0500	138 lines
domains missing	Wu, Mousheng	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:38:41 -0500	138 lines
My flower crystals	Jinzhi Tan	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:45:16 +0200	20 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Philippe DUMAS	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:28:47 +0200	200 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Bernhard Rupp	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:06:50 -0700	65 lines
Re: My flower crystals	James Whisstock	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:02:49 +1000	40 lines
Re: domains missing	<>	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:13:14 -0500	122 lines
Re: domains missing	<>	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:13:14 -0500	122 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Edward A. Berry	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:29:49 -0700	49 lines
extra density on Cysteine	<>	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:58:30 +0800	26334 lines
extra density on Cysteine	<>	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:58:30 +0800	26336 lines
Re: extra density on Cysteine	Artem Evdokimov	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:51:16 -0400	248 lines
Re: extra density on Cysteine	Artem Evdokimov	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:51:16 -0400	248 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Edward Berry	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:03:51 -0700	46 lines
Seeking collaborators.	cry	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:08:10 +0800	63 lines
Re: step 1 & step 2	Ian Tickle	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:29:17 +0100	178 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Ian Tickle	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:56:07 +0100	264 lines
Re: extra density on Cysteine	mesters	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:46:38 +0200	73 lines
question	Mirek Cygler	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:04:13 -0400	20 lines
coot in stereo	Paul D. Cook	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:22:25 +0100	26 lines
Re: coot in stereo	Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS]	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:37:02 -0400	50 lines
Re: extra density on Cysteine	Stephen Graham	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:48:35 +0100	53 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Ian Tickle	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:11:42 +0100	134 lines
Computer/X-ray Crystallography Laboratory Manager at Scripps-Florida	Izard, Tina	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:59:50 -0500	99 lines
Computer/X-ray Crystallography Laboratory Manager at Scripps-Florida	Izard, Tina	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:59:50 -0500	99 lines
Re: question	Wim Burmeister	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:16:28 +0200	51 lines
Re: coot in stereo	<>	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:55:47 -0400	139 lines
Postdoctoral fellow / Research Associate position with the Structural Genomics Consortium, Toronto	alexey bochkarev	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:15:08 -0400	99 lines
Postdoctoral fellow / Research Associate position with the Structural Genomics Consortium, Toronto	alexey bochkarev	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:15:08 -0400	99 lines
Re: coot in stereo	Kay Diederichs	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:53:50 +0200	131 lines
about error in MGLtools1.4.5 and autodock4	Zhiyong Lou	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:14:58 +0800	218 lines
about error in MGLtools1.4.5 and autodock4	Zhiyong Lou	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:14:58 +0800	218 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Ian Tickle	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:46:48 +0100	259 lines
Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]	Ian Tickle	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:03:23 +0100	70 lines
Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]	Andy Purkiss-Trew	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:12:07 +0100	78 lines
Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:23:45 +0100	77 lines
Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]	Kay Diederichs	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:24:24 +0200	143 lines
Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]	Kay Diederichs	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:24:24 +0200	160 lines
Re: CCP4 rotation convention	Ian Tickle	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:28:08 +0100	332 lines
Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]	Charles Ballard	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:39:41 +0100	107 lines
ID-13 XDS.INP	Dr. Colin W. Levy	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:03:06 +0100	20 lines
Re: coot in stereo	Oganesyan, Vaheh	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:28:34 -0400	66 lines
New CCP4 Molecular Graphics (1.1beta2)	CCP4 Molecular Graphics Team	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:51:37 +0100	29 lines
The importance of USING our validation tools	Eleanor Dodson	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:11:10 +0100	4557 lines
Re: ID-13 XDS.INP	Kay Diederichs	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:26:44 +0200	119 lines
SGI Indigo II question	David Roberts	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:40:17 -0400	38 lines
Oligomer which lacks conformational cooperativity	Jacob Keller	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:39:14 -0500	44 lines
Re: Oligomer which lacks conformational cooperativity	Daniel Schlieper	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:59:27 +0200	60 lines
Re: Oligomer which lacks conformational cooperativity	Jacob Keller	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:23:40 -0500	64 lines
"Dry" structures	Sabini, Elisabetta	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:35:17 -0500	443 lines
Re: "Dry" structures	Kumar, Abhinav	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:54:08 -0700	409 lines
model DNA-binding crystals?	Frank von Delft	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:13:37 +0100	17 lines
Re: model DNA-binding crystals?	Das, Debanu	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:31:17 -0700	58 lines
Re: follow up on model DNA-binding crystals?	Das, Debanu	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:38:29 -0700	79 lines
Structure help	Yanming Zhang	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:24:56 -0400	49 lines
Re: Structure help	Juergen Bosch	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:48:29 -0700	90 lines
Re: Structure help	Das, Debanu	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:50:00 -0700	100 lines
Re: Structure help	George M. Sheldrick	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:59:33 +0200	66 lines
Re: "Dry" structures	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:49:10 +0100	49 lines
Re: "Dry" structures	Benini, Stefano	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:02:45 +0100	87 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:13:21 +0100	1174 lines
Re: Structure help	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:16:27 +0100	65 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Gina Clayton	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:09:48 -0400	128 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Randy J. Read	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:22:20 +0100	102 lines
NSCM keyword in MolRep	Cynthia Czyrphony	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:28:03 +0200	30 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	James Whisstock	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:33:17 +1000	144 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:38:46 +0100	144 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Ashley Buckle	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:05:47 +1000	328 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Phil Evans	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:13:29 +0100	65 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Ashley Buckle	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:21:06 +1000	291 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mischa Machius	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:30:17 -0500	95 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mischa Machius	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:46:14 -0500	113 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Clemens Vonrhein	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:47:10 +0100	102 lines
Problem with VDW restraints in Refmac	Alastair McEwen	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:55:27 +0200	40 lines
The importance of USING our validation tools	Santarsiero, Bernard D.	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:04:25 -0500	125 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Green, Todd	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:11:10 -0500	160 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mark J. van Raaij	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:11:51 +0200	381 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Anastassis Perrakis	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:13:03 +0200	118 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Ashley Buckle	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:14:13 +1000	519 lines
Re: Problem with VDW restraints in Refmac	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:16:39 +0100	51 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Kay Diederichs	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:16:54 +0200	145 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Andrew Raine	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:22:18 +0100	31 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Edward A Berry	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:30:04 -0700	157 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:59:38 +0100	161 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Juergen Bosch	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:30:33 -0700	150 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Clemens Vonrhein	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:42:31 +0100	39 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Peter Keller	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:47:50 +0100	44 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Jacob Keller	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:56:44 -0500	38 lines
Correct H-bond length in CYS.cif ?	Juergen J. Mueller	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:57:36 +0200	23 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mark J. van Raaij	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:00:02 +0200	468 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Richard Baxter	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:33:46 -0500	132 lines
Best Practices in Virtual Screening	Barry Hardy	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:40:26 +0200	256 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Bernhard Rupp	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:39:27 -0700	37 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	George M. Sheldrick	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:10:01 +0200	41 lines
nature cb3 comment pdf	Bernhard Rupp	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:41:37 -0700	28 lines
Re: nature cb3 comment pdf	Bernhard Rupp	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:03:02 -0700	48 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	James Whisstock	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:43:21 +1000	172 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Dunten, Pete W.	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:21:08 -0700	36 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Dominika Borek	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:32:55 -0500	161 lines
nature cb3 response	Bernhard Rupp	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:33:30 -0700	109 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mischa Machius	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:42:05 -0500	30 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Dima Klenchin	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:01:51 -0500	20 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	<>	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:10:17 -0500	127 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	Bernhard Rupp	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:39:58 -0700	47 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	William Scott	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:13:41 -0700	25 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	Marcos Vicente de Albuquerque Salles Navarro	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:17:25 -0300	154 lines
possibility of other fabricated structures	Petr Leiman	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:00 -0400	23 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	William Scott	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:55:53 -0700	30 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	George M. Sheldrick	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:36:18 +0200	201 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Shekhar C. Mande	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:21:02 +0530	144 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Manuel Than	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:10:33 +0200	47 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Winter, G (Graeme)	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:23:27 +0100	109 lines
Re: possibility of other fabricated structures	Tim Fenn	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:41:27 -0400	40 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Martin A. Walsh	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:09:28 +0200	153 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Clemens Vonrhein	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:00:18 +0100	63 lines
C3b, validation, deposition diffraction images	Luca Jovine	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:20:00 +0200	83 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Martin A. Walsh	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:29:35 +0200	88 lines
Public forums	Hurley, Thomas D.	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:36:37 -0400	56 lines
The importance of USING our validation tools	<>	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:38:21 +0200	22 lines
LivePDB (related to: The importance of ... )	Gerard Bricogne	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:22:38 +0100	91 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Anastassis Perrakis	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:38:00 +0200	71 lines
Application Specialist - X-Ray Crystallography for Life-Science	Adam, Martin	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:19:25 +0200	608 lines
Re: public forums	Hurley, Thomas D.	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:36:09 -0400	147 lines
Re: public forums	Andreas Forster	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:43:44 +0200	137 lines
Richard Reid and the PDB	Kim Henrick	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:04:27 +0100	144 lines
Depositing Raw Data	Mischa Machius	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:06:51 -0500	178 lines
Michele Cianci is out of the office.	Michele Cianci	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:09:50 +0200	12 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	Oganesyan, Vaheh	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:29:46 -0400	157 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	cdekker	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:46:22 +0100	89 lines
Re: nature cb3 response - USING validation criteria	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:48:53 +0100	19 lines
Re: Richard Reid and the PDB	Clemens Vonrhein	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:50:01 +0100	61 lines
Re: Depositing Raw Data	Winter, G (Graeme)	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:50:04 +0100	215 lines
Diffraction data - a modest proposal	<>	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:10:34 -0400	29 lines
High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure	Sabini, Elisabetta	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:36:30 -0500	732 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	Arun Malhotra	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:36:56 -0400	88 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	<>	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:42:20 -0500	176 lines
Re: Depositing Raw Data	Winter, G (Graeme)	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:45:28 +0100	254 lines
Re: High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure	Peter Zwart	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:48:25 -0700	142 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	Arun Malhotra	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:52:28 -0400	88 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Manfred S. Weiss	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:53:05 +0200	36 lines
Re: High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:56:57 +0100	48 lines
Data mining using consensus sequences	P Hubbard	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:13:57 -0700	47 lines
Depositing raw data	Diana Tomchick	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:15:01 -0500	43 lines
Re: Depositing Raw Data	Mischa Machius	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:29:43 -0500	301 lines
Re: Data mining using consensus sequences	Miller, Mitchell D.	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:41:48 -0700	60 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Ronald E Stenkamp	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:50:06 -0700	38 lines
High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure	Santarsiero, Bernard D.	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:11:45 -0500	24 lines
Re: High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure	Juergen Bosch	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:18:33 -0700	51 lines
Re: Depositing raw data	Das, Debanu	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:50:40 -0700	111 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	Edward Snell	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:40:40 -0400	35 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	William Scott	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:51:06 -0700	102 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	<>	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:13:58 -0400	71 lines
Re: nature cb3 response	Arun Malhotra	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:41:13 -0400	144 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	James Stroud	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:08:30 -0700	42 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Anthony Addlagatta	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:15:32 -0700	35 lines
Re: Richard Reid and the PDB	Bernhard Rupp	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:24:45 -0700	196 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Douglas Theobald	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:26:15 -0400	52 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Anastassis Perrakis	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:45:54 +0200	93 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Dale Tronrud	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:19:37 -0700	112 lines
diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Maneesh Yadav	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:01:54 -0700	18 lines
Re: Depositing Raw Data	James Holton	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:26:39 -0700	840 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mark J. van Raaij	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:28:31 +0200	200 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	George M. Sheldrick	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:26:50 +0200	90 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Artem Evdokimov	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:11:18 -0400	117 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mischa Machius	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:35:05 -0500	128 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Juergen Bosch	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:19:42 -0700	210 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Thomas Stout	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:34:18 -0700	316 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Artem Evdokimov	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:44:11 -0400	272 lines
FW: [ccp4bb] The importance of USING our validation tools	Kantardjieff, Katherine	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:12:10 -0700	98 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Lisa A Nagy	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:45:45 -0500	92 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	George M. Sheldrick	Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:49:17 +0200	109 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Boaz Shaanan	Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:38:07 GMT	432 lines
self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes	Yanming Zhang	Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:50:23 -0400	5792 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Alexander Aleshin	Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:24:46 -0800	150 lines
Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes	Wim Burmeister	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:08:24 +0200	54 lines
Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes	Miguel Ortiz-Lombardía	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:23:15 +0200	143 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	George M. Sheldrick	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:24:09 +0200	178 lines
Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes	Wim Burmeister	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:27:03 +0200	30 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Winter, G (Graeme)	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:34:25 +0100	56 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Harry Powell	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:20:51 +0100	78 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Phil Evans	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:55:35 +0100	236 lines
Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?	Juergen J. Mueller	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:30:54 +0200	28 lines
Re: Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?	Eleanor Dodson	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:46:11 +0100	37 lines
AW: [ccp4bb] Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?	<>	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:10:35 +0200	52 lines
Re: Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?	George M. Sheldrick	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:17:49 +0200	49 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Miller, Mitchell D.	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:53:26 -0700	187 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Axel T. Brunger	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:36:05 -0700	257 lines
Scientist or Senior Scientist position available in Plexxikon Inc.	Jinyu Liu	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:07:43 -0700	260 lines
Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes	Alejandro Buschiazzo	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:13:04 -0300	120 lines
Release of Mosflm version 7.0.1 & iMosflm 0.5.3	Harry Powell	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:26:25 +0100	57 lines
Re: Release of Mosflm version 7.0.1 & iMosflm 0.5.3	Harry Powell	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:02:16 +0100	30 lines
water water everywhere	<>	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:05:06 -0500	28 lines
Re: water water everywhere	William Scott	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:57:38 -0700	44 lines
Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes	Yanming Zhang	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:13:58 -0400	23 lines
Seeking collaborators.Again.	cry	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:51:32 +0800	68 lines
Ph.D. Studentship in Structural Biology	Ellis, MJ (Mark)	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:37:23 +0100	115 lines
ID-13 XDS.INP Update	Dr. Colin W. Levy	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:10:08 +0100	22 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Herbert J. Bernstein	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:45:51 -0400	81 lines
Water is about 60% everywhere	Tom Oldfield	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:01:01 +0100	29 lines
Re: [COOT] how to join the broken strand to the other whole molecular	Eleanor Dodson	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:36:02 +0100	60 lines
problem with Mr Bump?	Harry M. Greenblatt	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:59:05 +0300	176 lines
Inadequate Summary: The importance of USING our validation tools	Eleanor Dodson	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:56:40 +0100	2564 lines
Re: Water is about 60% everywhere	William Scott	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:17:23 -0700	40 lines
Re: Water is about 60% everywhere	Marko Hyvonen	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:48:00 +0100	67 lines
Re: Wasp web server	Jacob Keller	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:54:31 -0500	68 lines
Re: Wasp web server	Ian Tickle	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:25:16 +0100	164 lines
mosflm and APS BM17	Jan Abendroth	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:20:19 -0700	35 lines
Re: mosflm and APS BM17	Roger Rowlett	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:36:27 -0400	61 lines
Re: problem with Mr Bump?	Winn, MD (Martyn)	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:47:38 +0100	54 lines
Post doc in structural character ization of the membrane-integrat ed plastid phosphate translocato rs, Tromsø, Norway	Arne Oskar Smalås	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:02:51 +0200	47 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	William Scott	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:40:05 -0700	28 lines
Re: mosflm and APS BM17	Harry Powell	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:28:13 +0100	56 lines
Re: [COOT] how to join the broken strand to the other whole molecular	Antony Oliver	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:57:21 +0100	87 lines
Re: Wasp web server	Ian Tickle	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:00:30 +0100	252 lines
area detector dark current/background correction	Klaas Decanniere	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:05:59 +0200	26 lines
crystal with precipitation	shivesh kumar	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:52:04 +0530	38 lines
Re: crystal with precipitation	Lisa A Nagy	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:08 -0500	152 lines
Re: mosflm and APS BM17	Jan Abendroth	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:14:20 -0700	73 lines
[Fwd: Re: [ccp4bb]: self rotation function matrix & NCS matrix]	<>	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:15:18 -0400	65 lines
Probelm in creating topology files for CNS refinement	Sampath Natarajan	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:52:47 -0700	1510 lines
Re: Probelm in creating topology files for CNS refinement	<>	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:50:49 -0400	773 lines
SciVee - YouTube for scientist	Clemens Vonrhein	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:57:49 +0100	45 lines
Re: SciVee - YouTube for scientist	Ronnie Berntsson	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:58:26 +0200	244 lines
Re: SciVee - YouTube for scientist	Ronnie Berntsson	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:30:30 +0200	293 lines
Postdoctoral positions in crystallography in Stockholm, Sweden	Adnane Achour	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:12:44 +0200	80 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Edwin Pozharski	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:52:08 -0400	53 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Jordi Benach	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:24:17 +0200	99 lines
Re: crystal with precipitation	Rob Gruninger	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:30:07 -0600	44 lines
contact density	Mary Rorick	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:10:12 -0400	27 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Zbyszek Otwinowski	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:17:58 -0500	41 lines
crystal with precipitation	Lisa A Nagy	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:21:25 -0500	153 lines
ccp4 pack_images program?	William Scott	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:33:52 -0700	32 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Anastassis Perrakis	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:26:39 +0200	56 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	James Holton	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:46:51 -0700	153 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	James Holton	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:52:56 -0700	65 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Tim Fenn	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:51:20 -0700	51 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Zbyszek Otwinowski	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:54:09 -0500	29 lines
Re: ccp4 pack_images program?	Winter, G (Graeme)	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:12:26 +0100	33 lines
Re: crystal with precipitation	shivesh kumar	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:37:07 +0530	46 lines
Re: ccp4 pack_images program?	William Scott	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:25:00 -0700	44 lines
Re: crystal with precipitation	James Whisstock	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:34:31 +1000	46 lines
Re: crystal with precipitation	<>	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:52:46 -0400	77 lines
Re: ccp4 pack_images program?	Jim Pflugrath	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:00:50 -0500	18 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Jenny Martin	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:46:14 +1000	36 lines
alternate indexing / cubic space group	Green, Todd	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:46:37 -0500	241 lines
Re: alternate indexing / cubic space group	Zbyszek Otwinowski	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:16:07 -0500	31 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Dale Tronrud	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:17:23 -0700	77 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Petr Leiman	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:01:54 -0400	42 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Axel T. Brunger	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:16:06 -0700	83 lines
Re: ccp4 pack_images program?	P.J.Briggs	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:54:26 +0100	62 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Winter, G (Graeme)	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:29:14 +0100	255 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Winter, G (Graeme)	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:55:15 +0100	195 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Harry Powell	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:20:29 +0100	45 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Gerard Bricogne	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:14:29 +0100	78 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Harry Powell	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:39:31 +0100	112 lines
centrosymm structure	Bernhard Rupp	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:56:56 -0700	34 lines
Re: centrosymm structure	Soisson, Stephen Michael	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:59:27 -0400	66 lines
Re: centrosymm structure	Soisson, Stephen Michael	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:09:55 -0400	114 lines
postdoctoral positions available	Van Den Berg, Bert	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:32:16 -0400	82 lines
Mosflm v 7.0.1 Mac Intel pre-built executable.	Harry Powell	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:32:26 +0100	35 lines
Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000	Gerard Bricogne	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:58:54 +0100	147 lines
Re: centrosymm structure	Bart Hazes	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:02:49 -0600	79 lines
Questions about diffraction	Michel Fodje	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:22:19 -0600	45 lines
PX Jobs Team Leader, Postdoc, Tech (SGC-Oxford).txt	Frank von Delft	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:44:30 +0100	46 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Ethan Merritt	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:46:33 -0700	30 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Dale Tronrud	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:56:47 -0700	35 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Michel Fodje	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:40:13 -0600	37 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Michel Fodje	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:55:20 -0600	26 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Michel Fodje	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:08:19 -0600	41 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Jacob Keller	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:15:36 -0500	60 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	William Scott	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:42:27 -0700	36 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Dale Tronrud	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:48:33 -0700	56 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	James Stroud	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:00:16 -0700	86 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	James Stroud	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:36:29 -0700	64 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Michel Fodje	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:07:10 -0600	71 lines
Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol	Rob Gruninger	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:08:55 -0600	28 lines
Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol	Edward Berry	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:38:13 -0700	36 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Dale Tronrud	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:49:44 -0700	101 lines
Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol	James Whisstock	Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:18:55 +1000	51 lines
Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol	Artem Evdokimov	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:46:30 -0400	43 lines
Re: Alternate indexing	J.P. Rose	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:23:04 -0400	15 lines
Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol	bputcha	Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:06:22 -0400	51 lines
Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol	Patrick Shaw Stewart	Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:42:28 +0100	55 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Andrzej Olczak	Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:22:02 +0200	48 lines
mail archives that are actually usable?	William Scott	Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:53:28 -0700	30 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Mark J. van Raaij	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:57:45 +0200	247 lines
alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622	Jorge Iulek	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:47:54 -0300	63 lines
Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622	<>	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:41:04 -0400	35 lines
Strange diffraction images	Jacob Keller	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:44:23 -0500	118 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	George M. Sheldrick	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:19:15 +0200	76 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Jacob Keller	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:31:26 -0500	100 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images - PS	George M. Sheldrick	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:35:02 +0200	36 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Raji Edayathumangalam	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:36:08 -0400	91 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Jacob Keller	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:42:58 -0500	112 lines
Applying NCS Edits in Coot	<>	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:34:04 +0200	20 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Green, Todd	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:49:25 -0500	6263 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Peter Zwart	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:10:55 -0700	29 lines
Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622	Dale Tronrud	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:47:03 -0700	79 lines
Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622	Bart Hazes	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:57:24 -0600	116 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Bart Hazes	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:02:36 -0600	137 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Jacob Keller	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:44:07 -0500	194 lines
Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622	Rizkallah, PJ (Pierre)	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:27:29 +0100	145 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Kevin Cowtan	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:14:41 +0100	30 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Boaz Shaanan	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:43:23 GMT	270 lines
AW: [ccp4bb] Strange diffraction images	<>	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:49:58 +0200	512 lines
Practical Course in Macromolecular Crystallography M2M-7	Victor Lamzin	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:03:37 +0200	46 lines
PDRA position	Dr John Rafferty	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +0100	31 lines
PDRA post in Sheffield further details	Dr John Rafferty	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:42:51 +0100	25 lines
Re: Applying NCS Edits in Coot	Paul Emsley	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:56:44 +0100	30 lines
Job offer: Postdoctoral Scientist in X-ray structural analysis of plant proteins	Prof. Dr. Arne Skerra	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:22:34 +0200	47 lines
Mean phase difference calculation	Winter, G (Graeme)	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:20:32 +0100	98 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	James Holton	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:56:16 -0700	187 lines
Re: Mean phase difference calculation	Kevin Cowtan	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:22:47 +0100	49 lines
water soluble protein that needs detergent to be stable	Daniel Jin	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:44:38 -0700	90 lines
alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622 - feedback / quasi SUMMARY	<>	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:17:44 -0300	126 lines
Re: Questions about diffraction	Nave, C (Colin)	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:54:10 +0100	237 lines
Re: water soluble protein that needs detergent to be stable	Artem Evdokimov	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:02:04 -0400	417 lines
Resid for occupancy	Vu Thai	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:04:12 -0700	22 lines
Re: Mean phase difference calculation	Winter, G (Graeme)	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:04:03 +0100	75 lines
Re: water soluble protein that needs detergent to be stable	Daniel Picot	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:10:58 +0200	62 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	James Stroud	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:39:23 -0700	37 lines
Re: Mean phase difference calculation	Phil Evans	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:38:09 +0100	51 lines
permanent crystalliser job - AZ Boston	Pauptit, Richard A	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:22:44 +0100	26 lines
Why wwPDB and members are doing a poor job.	Joe Krahn	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:08:22 -0400	77 lines
Rotation function calculation from 2 patterson maps	Raja Dey	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:32:42 -0700	14 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Raji Edayathumangalam	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:43:37 -0400	82 lines
High solvent content crystals	Joe Krahn	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:10:35 -0400	72 lines
exporting the "NCS found for Chain ... onto Chain ..." map	<>	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:15:03 +0100	40 lines
solving structure of which 70% is known	Raja Dey	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:30:51 -0700	14 lines
Question about the percentages of occupancy for dual conformations.	Jian Wu	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:57:46 +0800	49 lines
Re: Question about the percentages of occupancy for dual conformations.	George M. Sheldrick	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:36:54 +0200	48 lines
Postdoc protein crystallographer in Greece	Demetres D. Leonidas	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:38:53 +0300	60 lines
How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	Hyunchul Kim	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:43:35 +0900	24 lines
Postdoc protein crystallographer in Greece	Demetres D. Leonidas	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:48:15 +0300	58 lines
Re: Mean phase difference calculation	Adam Ralph	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:19:54 +0100	59 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	David Briggs	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:38:21 +0100	326 lines
Pre - announcement for Study Weekend, 3 - 5 January 2008	Howard, ME (Maeri)	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:11:10 +0100	243 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Ambrose Cole	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:00:51 +0100	486 lines
How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	Antony Oliver	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:16:33 +0100	78 lines
Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	Hyunchul Kim	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:22:29 +0900	69 lines
Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	Clemens Vonrhein	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:31:17 +0100	87 lines
MSE	Phil Evans	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:44:38 +0100	26 lines
Re: solving structure of which 70% is known	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:05:36 +0100	23 lines
Re: MSE	Ian Tickle	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:07:01 +0100	75 lines
Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	Antony Oliver	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:09:13 +0100	138 lines
Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	Paul Emsley	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:15:48 +0100	46 lines
Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	Warren DeLano	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:17:03 -0700	50 lines
Re: MSE	Joe Krahn	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:20:38 -0400	49 lines
Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?	<>	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:27:48 +0100	140 lines
Re: MSE	Marko Hyvonen	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:28:18 +0100	86 lines
off-topic-Heat shock protein gets precipitated	shivesh kumar	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:36:22 +0530	35 lines
Re: Rotation function calculation from 2 patterson maps	Eleanor Dodson	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:00:54 +0100	37 lines
Re: off-topic-Heat shock protein gets precipitated	Martin Hallberg	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:05:36 +0200	44 lines
Re: MSE	Joe Krahn	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:33:26 -0400	33 lines
Re: MSE	Kim Henrick	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:41:48 +0100	87 lines
Re: MSE	P.Artymiuk	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:09:43 +0100	40 lines
Re: solving structure of which 70% is known	<>	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:19:59 -0500	42 lines
CDC position available	Stevens, James (CDC/CCID/NCIRD)	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:31:50 -0400	103 lines
Re: MSE	Charlie Bond	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:43:19 +0800	31 lines
Re: contact density	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:01:02 +0100	40 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:03:56 +0100	37 lines
Re: The importance of USING our validation tools	Jon Wright	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:24:42 +0200	44 lines
small molecule refinement GUI for Mac	Kristof Van Hecke	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:16:09 +0200	110 lines
Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:57:41 +0100	81 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Eleanor Dodson	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:00:47 +0100	213 lines
Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac	Miller, Mitchell D.	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:20:32 -0700	60 lines
Re: Strange diffraction images	Green, Todd	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:31:30 -0500	1471 lines
Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac	William Scott	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:14:22 -0700	72 lines
Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac	Bryan W. Lepore	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:15:01 -0500	17 lines
Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac	Peter Zwart	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:19:58 -0700	83 lines
How many twinned crystals?	Jacob Keller	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:32:08 -0500	19 lines
Re: How many twinned crystals?	Ian Tickle	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:46:34 +0100	68 lines
Buried lysines!	Ramaswamy Subramanian	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:32:22 -0500	22 lines
Re: How many twinned crystals?	George M. Sheldrick	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:14:34 +0200	77 lines
mrBUMP 0.4.1 questions	Ricardo Aparicio	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:46:53 -0300	63 lines
phaser + phased-TF	Bryan W. Lepore	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:06:27 -0500	13 lines
water picking	Jianghai Zhu	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:07:32 -0400	108 lines
pointless / batch number / axial hkl	Bryan W. Lepore	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:52:51 -0500	25 lines
Re: pointless / batch number / axial hkl	Phil Evans	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:15:42 +0100	41 lines

CCP4BB Archives

August 2007

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives