|
|
|
Size
|
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class" (OOO 3/6 - 3/9)
|
Darin Stewart |
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 04:45:44 -0800 |
15 lines |
DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Thomas Baker |
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:49:05 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:15:22 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Dan Brickley |
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:43:48 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Dan Brickley |
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:53:34 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:24:08 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Cecil Somerton |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:30:27 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:20:57 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Thomas Baker |
Sat, 11 Mar 2006 07:58:41 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
Sarah Pulis |
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:57:22 +1100 |
81 lines |
Re: DCAM missing definitions for "sub-property" and "sub-class"
|
John Roberts |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:08:59 +1300 |
76 lines |
Spec naming
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:49:40 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Spec naming
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:54:16 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Spec naming
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:22:58 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Spec naming
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:31:48 +0000 |
27 lines |
More Swoogle stats
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:43:36 +0000 |
33 lines |
FW: Domains and ranges of DC properties
|
Andy Powell |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:21:12 -0000 |
62 lines |
Re: Spec naming
|
Dan Brickley |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:41:43 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: FW: Domains and ranges of DC properties
|
Rachel Heery |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:44:55 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: FW: Domains and ranges of DC properties
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:24:36 +0100 |
148 lines |
Re: FW: Domains and ranges of DC properties
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:05:52 +0000 |
134 lines |
Re: DCAM definition of "related resource" (OOO 3/27 - 3/28)
|
Darin Stewart |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:02:34 -0800 |
14 lines |
DCAM definition of "related resource"
|
Thomas Baker |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:05:36 +0200 |
40 lines |
The International Arab Conference on Information Technology - CALL FOR PAPERS
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:56:05 +0100 |
289 lines |
Re: FW: Domains and ranges of DC properties
|
Ann Apps |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:53:26 +0100 |
121 lines |
Re: FW: Domains and ranges of DC properties
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:33:31 +0100 |
63 lines |
Wendy Martin/IS/GB/BTC/TBC is out of the office.
|
Wendy Martin |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:14:01 +0100 |
12 lines |
Moving DC-RDF taskforce discussion here
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:04:31 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:11:05 +0200 |
104 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:20:41 +0200 |
54 lines |
DC RDF Issue collection
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:27:04 +0200 |
142 lines |
DC in RDF property range statistics from swoogle
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:32:44 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:54:39 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Related descriptions (Was Re: Issue 4: Rich representations)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:09:56 +0200 |
109 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:23:40 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Rachel Heery |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:56:13 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Issue 4: Rich representations
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:58:03 +0200 |
114 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:21:05 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:33:13 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Dan Brickley |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:52:13 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:57:44 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:02:51 +0200 |
91 lines |
Re: DCMI Schema model and the DC-in-RDF spec
|
Thomas Baker |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:04:10 +0200 |
40 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:02:41 +0200 |
177 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:26:09 +0200 |
67 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:51:59 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:18:25 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Rachel Heery |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:16:35 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:26:06 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:56:01 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: DCRDFExecutiveSummary3
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:17:37 +0200 |
28 lines |