JISCMail - DC-DATE Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DC-DATE Archives

July 2005

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DC-DATE Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Revised text for comment with DC Date element definition	Childress,Eric	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:46:56 -0400	218 lines
Results of DC Date comment vote	Childress,Eric	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:43:13 -0400	220 lines
Re: Recommended new text for DC Date comment -- vote	Charles McCathieNevile	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:45:54 +0200	31 lines
Re: [May Be Spam] Recommended new text for DC Date comment -- vote	Kelly A Green	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:22:41 -0400	176 lines
Re: Recommended new text for DC Date comment -- vote	Douglas Campbell	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:34:45 +1200	78 lines
DCMI Date Working Group Status Report	Childress,Eric	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:59:58 -0400	249 lines
Re: dumb-down and ranges	Pete Johnston	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:23:52 +0100	102 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Rebecca S. Guenther	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:16:53 -0400	641 lines
Recommended new text for DC Date comment -- vote	Childress,Eric	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:11:07 -0400	267 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Clayphan, Robina	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:12:20 +0100	263 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Charles McCathieNevile	Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:25:05 +0100	39 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Andy Powell	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 09:16:23 +0100	64 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Ann Apps	Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:32:26 +0100	79 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Steve Sarapata	Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:08:17 -0400	390 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Childress,Eric	Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:58:00 -0400	153 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Childress,Eric	Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:52:54 -0400	68 lines
dumb-down and ranges	Charles McCathieNevile	Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:01:09 +0200	63 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Charles McCathieNevile	Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:08:05 +0200	37 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Childress,Eric	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:31:36 -0400	255 lines
Re: What's wrong with ISO 8601	Douglas Campbell	Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:12:26 +1200	25 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Pete Johnston	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:17:34 +0100	52 lines
Re: DC Date WG meeting at DC 2005	Charles McCathieNevile	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:01:31 +0200	39 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Childress,Eric	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:51:53 -0400	497 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Childress,Eric	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:48:57 -0400	237 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Pete Johnston	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:16:34 +0100	120 lines
Re: What's wrong with ISO 8601	Pete Johnston	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:27:02 +0100	54 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Douglas Campbell	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:20:10 +1200	151 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Misha Wolf	Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:07:19 +0100	118 lines
DC Date WG meeting at DC 2005	Childress,Eric	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:54:57 -0400	144 lines
Re: Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Childress,Eric	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:40:05 -0400	386 lines
Re: What's wrong with ISO 8601	Childress,Eric	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:47:37 -0400	250 lines
Re: ISO 8601 info	Childress,Eric	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:32:25 -0400	217 lines
Fixing the dc:date comment/definition	Pete Johnston	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:08:22 +0100	51 lines
ISO 8601 info	Douglas Campbell	Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:03:41 +1200	29 lines
What's wrong with ISO 8601	Douglas Campbell	Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:45:19 +1200	42 lines

DC-DATE Archives

July 2005

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives