|
|
|
Size
|
Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Theo van Veen |
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:00:27 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:32:52 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:35:03 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Theo van Veen |
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:26:16 +0200 |
118 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Muriel Foulonneau |
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:30:16 -0500 |
132 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:03:35 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Andy Powell |
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:38:51 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Douglas Campbell |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:59:26 +1200 |
135 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:10:26 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Thomas Baker |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:26:08 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:36:19 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:52:15 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Douglas Campbell |
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:35:40 +1200 |
83 lines |
Re: Betr.: Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:17:59 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Douglas Campbell |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:04:10 +1200 |
92 lines |
Re: Do we need a separate property for logo?
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:18:00 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: ISIL and collection identifiers
|
Terry Willan |
Mon, 6 Sep 2004 07:46:59 +0100 |
405 lines |
Re: ISIL and collection identifiers
|
Douglas Campbell |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:28:22 +1200 |
352 lines |
Re: ISIL and collection identifiers
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:02:48 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: ISIL and collection identifiers
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:06:54 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: ISIL and collection identifiers
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:56:34 +0100 |
59 lines |
ISO8601 vs W3CDTF
|
Douglas Campbell |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:00:54 +1200 |
49 lines |
Re: ISO8601 vs W3CDTF
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:49:50 +0100 |
108 lines |
Re: ISO8601 vs W3CDTF
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:17:10 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: ISO8601 vs W3CDTF
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:35:04 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: ISO8601 vs W3CDTF
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:38:03 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Usage of dc:language
|
Douglas Campbell |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:38:33 +1200 |
106 lines |
Worked DC CD AP example
|
Douglas Campbell |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:15:56 +1200 |
114 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:32:09 +0100 |
285 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Douglas Campbell |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:19:11 +1200 |
89 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:02:39 +0100 |
75 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Douglas Campbell |
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:50:59 +1200 |
106 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Pete Johnston |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:01:37 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Douglas Campbell |
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:13:38 +1200 |
149 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:41:43 +0100 |
242 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Douglas Campbell |
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:53:13 +1200 |
88 lines |
Re: Worked DC CD AP example
|
Pete Johnston |
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:44:43 +0100 |
111 lines |