JISCMail - COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

2004

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	Date	Size
IBM XL Fortran V8.1 for Linux supports Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 NOW	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:40:48 -0500	30 lines
Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:51:23 +0100	12 lines
Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)	Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:24:30 -0500	44 lines
Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)	Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:13:02 -0800	58 lines
Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)	Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:38:20 -0500	44 lines
Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:40:28 -0800	29 lines
Integer formating	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:13:20 +0000	53 lines
Re: Integer formating	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:40:16 -0500	38 lines
Re: Integer formating	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:00:32 -0500	21 lines
Re: Integer formating	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:14:07 +0000	28 lines
Re: Integer formating	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:51:59 -0800	26 lines
Re: UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:33:07 +0000	44 lines
Re: UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:37:32 +0000	40 lines
Fortran Resources (January)	Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:38:15 +0100	729 lines
A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:27:31 -0500	51 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:14:18 +1100	36 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:24:05 -0500	46 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:06:31 -0800	53 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:21:24 -0500	44 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:54:55 -0800	29 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:35:40 -0800	25 lines
Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:50:27 -0600	235 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:09:22 -0800	53 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:11:28 -0600	27 lines
Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:23:30 -0800	47 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:26:05 -0500	293 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:26:48 -0800	25 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:30:29 -0800	47 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:33:14 -0600	27 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:57:05 -0800	36 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:00:03 -0800	24 lines
Somewhat OT...	Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:53:39 -0600	25 lines
Re: Somewhat OT...	Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:59:47 -0800	24 lines
Re: Somewhat OT...	Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:15:27 -0500	33 lines
Re: Somewhat OT...	Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:47:22 -0800	39 lines
Re: Somewhat OT...	Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:14:36 -0500	35 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:05:25 +0200	85 lines
My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:13:56 -0600	47 lines
Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:57:39 +0100	95 lines
Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:06:04 -0700	92 lines
Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:53:13 -0600	149 lines
Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:01:57 -0600	62 lines
Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:25:44 +0100	52 lines
Second call for papers	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:30:17 +0000	366 lines
Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)	Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:37:25 -0600	89 lines
tools for converting from f77 to f95	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:14:10 +0000	33 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:35:08 +1100	53 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:48:48 +0100	71 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:34:47 +0000	11 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:40:54 -0500	57 lines
practical issues with array-valued functions	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:11:51 -0700	34 lines
Re: practical issues with array-valued functions	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:21:16 -0500	26 lines
Re: practical issues with array-valued functions	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:45:45 -0600	46 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:13:35 +0000	60 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:29:38 -0500	43 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:27:45 -0600	73 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:05:21 -0800	81 lines
Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:57:19 +0000	64 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:03:46 -0800	36 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:05:17 -0700	50 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:43:34 +1000	52 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:09:23 +0000	48 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 07:49:12 -0500	48 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:15:51 +0900	43 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:19:43 +1000	43 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:19:43 +1000	29 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:19:43 +1000	33 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Sun, 8 Feb 2004 02:24:06 -0800	39 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:37:56 +1000	51 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:34:06 +0000	31 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:40:08 +0000	35 lines
Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:34:38 +0100	12 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:44:09 +0900	36 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:49:15 +0000	39 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:34:09 -0000	64 lines
Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 05:58:56 -0800	42 lines
ABORT with traceback	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 20:25:47 -0500	20 lines
Re: ABORT with traceback	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:07:51 -0500	52 lines
Re: ABORT with traceback	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:11:10 -0500	44 lines
Re: ABORT with traceback	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:46:12 +0000	40 lines
script language	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:55:25 +0800	54 lines
Re: script language	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:10:53 -0600	68 lines
Re: script language	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:20:01 +0800	28 lines
Re: ABORT with traceback	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:39:55 -0600	111 lines
Re: script language	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:42:44 +0100	92 lines
Re: script language	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:11:00 +0000	24 lines
Re: script language	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:41:34 +0800	29 lines
Re: script language	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:54:05 +1000	51 lines
Re: script language	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:20:54 +1030	52 lines
Re: script language	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:36:01 +0800	50 lines
memory allocation in conjuction with modules	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:28:29 -0700	47 lines
Re: script language	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:22:13 -0500	58 lines
Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:27:18 +0100	47 lines
Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 06:47:00 -0700	67 lines
Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:49:29 -0600	92 lines
Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:50:52 -0600	24 lines
Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:19:02 -0700	40 lines
Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:41:34 +0100	26 lines
test	Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:21:03 -0700	34 lines
Re: New Kinds of Kinds	Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:12:26 -0700	71 lines
target attribute	Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:09:38 +0100	65 lines
Re: target attribute	Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:10:15 -0700	25 lines
suggestion	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:02:08 -0500	20 lines
Re: suggestion	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:19:43 -0600	50 lines
Re: suggestion	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:28:41 -0500	64 lines
Re: suggestion	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:59:10 -0600	74 lines
Retire FORTRAN?!	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:41:30 -0500	29 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:17:02 -0800	47 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:01:45 -0800	24 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:45:33 -0600	76 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:08:11 -0800	38 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:09:43 -0600	88 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:53:24 +0100	82 lines
[Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:12:02 -0600	265 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:48:23 -0500	722 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:53:48 -0800	41 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:29:42 -0500	108 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:57:54 -0500	30 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:58:04 +0000	121 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:04:56 -0600	39 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:52:58 -0500	88 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:12:55 -0800	37 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:07:09 +0100	28 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:16:59 -0500	48 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:31:41 -0500	59 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:35:18 +0100	30 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:48:59 -0600	65 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:59:34 -0500	59 lines
Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:09:28 +0100	63 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:15:32 -0700	37 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:51:24 -0800	70 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:30:56 -0800	43 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:47:35 -0500	18 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:56:39 -0800	27 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:55:11 +0000	14 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:46:19 +0100	29 lines
Yet another thought: (RE: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:31:51 -0800	58 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:35:58 -0800	15 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:00:10 -0800	19 lines
Re: Retire FORTRAN?!	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:18:12 -0700	18 lines
(j3.2004-508) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:25:03 -0800	33 lines
(j3.2004-509) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:25:41 -0800	191 lines
Re: Yet another thought: (RE: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:34:38 -0800	26 lines
F90 interface to FFTW	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:03:10 -0500	16 lines
Question	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:55:03 -0500	30 lines
Array help requested	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:02:14 -0800	65 lines
Re: Array help requested	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:33:33 -0800	86 lines
Please disregard Array Help Requested	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:38:13 -0800	27 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:18:54 -0500	35 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:28:31 +1000	70 lines
Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:52:40 -0500	80 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:58:35 -0800	31 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:15:58 -0800	32 lines
Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:30:51 +1000	30 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:22:23 -0800	43 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:20:50 -0500	155 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:24:19 +1000	181 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:46:48 -0800	25 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:47:48 +1000	48 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:08:39 +0100	220 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:14:17 -0000	240 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:26:51 -0800	40 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:21:02 +0100	47 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:07:50 -0600	76 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:15:28 -0500	30 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:10:44 +0100	65 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:59:30 -0500	47 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:07:39 -0500	23 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:37:03 -0800	47 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:55:22 +0100	31 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:55:31 -0800	32 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:43:31 -0800	38 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:43:29 -0800	133 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:35:31 -0800	108 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:32:02 -0500	34 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:47:14 -0800	38 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:50:17 -0600	64 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:20:27 -0500	23 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:47:33 -0800	29 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:12:05 -0500	23 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:19:32 -0800	32 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:25:13 +0100	30 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:03:51 +0000	26 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:19:40 -0500	31 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:11:53 +0000	33 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:11:52 +1000	42 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:11:52 +1000	42 lines
Re: Ariane (was: Stir it up again?)	Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:11:53 +1000	75 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:27:18 -0500	58 lines
Re: Ariane (was: Stir it up again?)	Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:26:25 +0000	29 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:28:41 -0500	44 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:36:51 -0600	60 lines
Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)	Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:19:29 -0500	31 lines
(un)formatted IO	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:45:53 +0100	21 lines
multiple association	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:38:16 +0100	23 lines
Re: (un)formatted IO	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:22:26 +0100	20 lines
Re: (un)formatted IO	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:26:35 +0100	34 lines
Re: (un)formatted IO	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:15:21 +0100	80 lines
Re: multiple association	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:50:18 +0000	28 lines
Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:06:58 +0100	151 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:12:30 -0500	18 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:32:28 +0000	25 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:37:51 -0000	48 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:01:40 +1000	41 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:05:40 -0500	94 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:07:07 -0600	69 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:20:03 +0100	224 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:23:59 -0600	568 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:32:07 +0100	111 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:35:49 -0500	45 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:43:04 -0600	248 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:44:20 +0100	25 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:24:27 +0100	25 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:47:58 -0800	25 lines
Re: (un)formatted IO	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:29:18 -0800	86 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:19:58 -0000	45 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:48:11 -0700	30 lines
Requirements for revision of Fortran	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:02:35 +0000	39 lines
COMMON & SAVE	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:22:38 -0500	48 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:58:24 -0500	65 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:04:48 -0500	36 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:09:04 -0800	45 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:23:53 -0500	70 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:40:23 -0500	61 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:49:56 -0800	48 lines
Re: Stir it up again?	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:56:35 -0800	27 lines
(un)formatted IO	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:56:48 -0800	39 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:35:14 -0800	40 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:29:21 -0800	97 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:07:42 +0100	61 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:31:50 +1100	66 lines
Re: Symbols	Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:33:51 -0800	38 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:38:48 +1100	52 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:00:20 +0100	52 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:03:17 +1100	149 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:29:52 +1100	99 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:30:26 -0800	46 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:47:28 -0800	48 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:08:49 -0800	53 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:02:24 -0000	55 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:30:48 -0500	69 lines
Re: (un)formatted IO	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:37:26 +0900	21 lines
Re: (un)formatted IO	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:45:06 -0600	31 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:01:27 -0600	75 lines
Re: Symbols	Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:20 +1000	22 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:56:06 -0700	72 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:03:10 -0500	46 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:03:12 -0500	74 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:28:08 -0600	61 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:47:53 -0600	277 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:06:35 -0500	68 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:08:55 -0500	24 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:55:59 -0600	36 lines
COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:29:31 -0800	31 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:37:06 -0700	102 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:43:05 -0500	60 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:17:00 -0500	33 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:54:20 -0800	55 lines
Re: COMMON & SAVE	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:06:18 -0800	54 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:30:08 -0800	50 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:44:41 -0800	34 lines
Re: Symbols	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:47:28 -0800	39 lines
Re: Symbols	Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:07:10 -0600	48 lines
Summary: (un)formatted IO	Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:13:24 +0100	22 lines
Re: (un)formatted IO	Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:24:33 -0600	292 lines
configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:05:45 +0900	221 lines
Re: configurable default real	Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:27:46 -0500	41 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:06:58 +0900	82 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:34:14 -0500	51 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:02:31 -0500	74 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:06:17 -0700	37 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:24:27 +1000	238 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:31:52 -0500	32 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:46:51 -0700	28 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sun, 7 Mar 2004 08:55:09 +0900	66 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sun, 7 Mar 2004 00:13:51 +0000	46 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:42:46 -0500	42 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:48:07 -0700	30 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:27:58 +0000	42 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:11:33 -0700	25 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:48:23 -0600	87 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:26:25 -0500	29 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:57 +1000	33 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:58 +1000	108 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:58 +1000	56 lines
configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:51:04 -0800	72 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:19:11 -0700	19 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:41:12 -0800	40 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:44:28 -0600	63 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:09:52 -0800	73 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:28:52 -0700	75 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:58:36 -0800	27 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:08:50 -0600	48 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:16:51 -0700	38 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:18:03 -0800	39 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:39:06 -0800	76 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:41:43 -0600	58 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:51:30 -0600	54 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:55:30 -0800	80 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:06:49 -0600	100 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:08:17 -0800	36 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:13:30 -0800	48 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:16:33 -0700	34 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:30:56 -0700	51 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:36:25 -0800	65 lines
Generics (was: configurable...)	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:58:39 -0700	28 lines
Re: Generics (was: configurable...)	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:11:25 -0800	52 lines
Re: Generics (was: configurable...)	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:33:23 -0700	62 lines
Is this example standard conforming ?	Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:35:05 -0500	28 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:11:43 +0000	41 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:23:33 +0000	65 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:19:37 +0000	44 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:17:07 +0900	47 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:48:23 -0500	25 lines
Re: configurable default real	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:53:05 +0900	84 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:49:35 -0600	35 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:56:50 -0800	23 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:18:47 -0700	26 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:29:35 -0800	53 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:38:42 +0100	66 lines
Re: Generics (was: configurable...)	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:50:22 -0800	48 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:55:31 -0800	47 lines
Re: Generics (was: configurable...)	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:28:09 -0700	77 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:38:17 -0700	20 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:54:54 -0600	28 lines
Data type "UNDEFINED"	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:56:19 -0500	74 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:10:03 -0800	33 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:08 -0700	35 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:22:49 -0600	95 lines
Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition - Pricing and Upgrades	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:27:26 -0500	102 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:34:45 -0800	90 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:14:36 -0800	68 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:35:51 -0700	43 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:05:35 -0800	27 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:01:37 -0700	20 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:32:46 -0800	32 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:09:46 -0700	43 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:19:51 -0800	27 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:45:34 -0700	26 lines
Isn't this standard conforming?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:48:18 -0700	27 lines
Re: Isn't this standard conforming?	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:56:59 -0800	36 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:09:37 +0000	39 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:22:59 -0500	57 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming ?	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:53:29 -0500	35 lines
Re: configurable default real	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:58:50 +1000	70 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:58:30 -0600	85 lines
Correction to message about Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:15:40 -0500	25 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:01:54 -0800	73 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:47:51 -0700	107 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:13:49 -0800	43 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:15:49 -0800	25 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:20:23 -0800	31 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:24:10 -0800	28 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:46:24 -0800	34 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:52:17 +0100	44 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:07:36 +1000	69 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:13:18 -0500	71 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:13:06 -0800	80 lines
Re: configurable default real	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:43:28 -0600	105 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:34:02 +1000	31 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:34:02 +1000	25 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000	20 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000	25 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000	40 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:08:41 -0500	88 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:39:38 -0600	94 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:35:58 -0800	52 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:35:28 -0600	94 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:48:03 -0600	26 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:02:49 -0000	27 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:08:01 -0800	51 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:33:06 -0600	42 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:07:43 -0800	43 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:20:55 -0800	45 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:25:48 -0500	25 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:37:34 -0800	20 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:54:00 -0600	43 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:32:30 +1030	109 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:41:07 -0600	63 lines
Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"	Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:15:57 -0000	29 lines
Fortran 9X and SQL	Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:05:55 -0600	115 lines
Re: Fortran 9X and SQL	Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:25:31 -0600	135 lines
Re: configurable default real	Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:22:25 +1000	61 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:04:11 -0800	20 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:12:06 -0800	42 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:49:47 -0600	62 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:05:50 -0800	22 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:09:31 -0500	30 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:16:52 -0800	27 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:47:42 -0600	63 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:53:16 -0600	48 lines
Re: configurable default real	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:12:08 -0800	26 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:36:38 -0600	62 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:52:15 -0500	31 lines
Fortran Resources (March, 2004)	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:20:28 -0000	743 lines
Is this other example standard conforming ?	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:13:36 -0500	33 lines
Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:22:11 -0500	21 lines
Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:24:19 +0000	40 lines
Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:29:15 -0500	17 lines
Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:44:09 +0100	22 lines
Is this construct standard conforming ?	Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:55:11 +0200	45 lines
Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?	Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:26:08 -0800	48 lines
Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?	Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:44:56 -0600	60 lines
Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?	Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:47:07 +0000	62 lines
Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?	Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:55:59 +0200	71 lines
lahey fortran 2003 support	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:48:41 +0000	15 lines
Re: lahey fortran 2003 support	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:52:26 -0500	21 lines
Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:32:30 +0100	12 lines
Re: lahey fortran 2003 support	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:00:07 +0000	48 lines
Re: lahey fortran 2003 support	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:22 -0800	36 lines
dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:19:02 -0600	41 lines
Re: dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:31:27 +0000	47 lines
Re: dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:38:01 -0800	60 lines
Re: dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:54:41 -0600	37 lines
Re: dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:24:51 -0800	58 lines
Re: dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:02:31 -0600	53 lines
Re: dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:49:16 -0500	22 lines
Re: dummy adjustable array size..	Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:07:58 -0600	27 lines
Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:00:44 +0000	15 lines
Re: Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:21:57 -0800	30 lines
data fingerprinting	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:52:23 -0700	25 lines
Re: data fingerprinting	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:10:29 -0800	51 lines
Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:58:36 -0500	29 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:39:48 +1000	34 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:27:15 +0100	39 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:40:42 +0200	66 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:07:46 +0100	52 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:00:35 +0200	81 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:17:37 -0600	113 lines
Re: configurable default real	Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:58:55 EST	43 lines
Fortran Open Directory	Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:12:55 -0800	42 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:29:56 +1000	57 lines
Re: configurable default real	Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:38:43 -0700	29 lines
Re: configurable default real	Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:30:56 -0800	46 lines
intel compilers for academic use	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:07:11 +0100	31 lines
Re: intel compilers for academic use	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 05:42:41 -0800	25 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:09:03 +1000	34 lines
F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:16:32 +0200	39 lines
Re: configurable default real	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 01:21:32 +1000	42 lines
Re: intel compilers for academic use	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:31:48 +0100	15 lines
Re: configurable default real	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:00:27 -0700	31 lines
Re: F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:10:33 -0800	53 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:37:29 -0500	33 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Sat, 3 Apr 2004 02:13:58 +1000	43 lines
Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:47:29 -0800	43 lines
Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?	Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:04:04 -0400	28 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?	Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:42:06 -0500	37 lines
Re: Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?	Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:57:08 -0400	23 lines
Quick allocate question	Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:40:32 +0200	29 lines
Re: Quick allocate question	Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:04:59 -0400	33 lines
Re: Quick allocate question	Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:30:37 +0200	56 lines
Re: Quick allocate question	Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:39:52 -0400	27 lines
Re: Quick allocate question	Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:22:13 -0500	45 lines
Re: Quick allocate question	Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:00:15 -0700	44 lines
explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 18:35:58 +0200	33 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 10:21:14 -0700	52 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 12:32:09 -0500	42 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 12:33:56 -0500	44 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 21:45:57 +0200	62 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 15:51:47 -0400	40 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 16:01:45 -0400	44 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 22:08:46 +0200	40 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 22:15:23 +0200	57 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 16:15:52 -0400	32 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 16:22:58 -0400	21 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 16:26:23 -0400	30 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 17:54:20 -0500	41 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Mon, 3 May 2004 21:10:57 -0700	47 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Tue, 4 May 2004 09:35:46 +0200	76 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Tue, 4 May 2004 09:25:36 -0400	52 lines
Re: explicit interfaces and array passing	Tue, 4 May 2004 12:37:57 -0400	35 lines
modules & intrinsic functions	Mon, 10 May 2004 15:08:28 +0100	23 lines
Re: modules & intrinsic functions	Mon, 10 May 2004 15:45:17 +0100	103 lines
Re: modules & intrinsic functions	Mon, 10 May 2004 07:46:56 -0700	53 lines
Re: modules & intrinsic functions	Tue, 11 May 2004 09:56:09 +1000	88 lines
ftn95 and modules	Wed, 12 May 2004 17:37:45 +0100	97 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Wed, 12 May 2004 10:04:29 -0700	39 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Wed, 12 May 2004 13:07:25 -0400	19 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Wed, 12 May 2004 12:09:17 -0500	20 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Wed, 12 May 2004 10:12:02 -0700	35 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Wed, 12 May 2004 11:38:16 -0600	23 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Wed, 12 May 2004 13:02:13 -0500	63 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Thu, 13 May 2004 08:26:28 +0100	27 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Fri, 14 May 2004 12:03:15 +0200	50 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Sun, 16 May 2004 13:11:33 +0200	35 lines
Re: ftn95 and modules	Mon, 17 May 2004 17:15:05 +0100	24 lines
Fortran Resources (May, 2004)	Thu, 20 May 2004 09:46:16 +0100	746 lines
use of module elements - is this legal?	Wed, 26 May 2004 09:13:15 -0700	108 lines
Re: use of module elements - is this legal?	Wed, 26 May 2004 17:32:12 +0100	43 lines
Re: use of module elements - is this legal?	Wed, 26 May 2004 11:32:54 -0500	21 lines
Re: use of module elements - is this legal?	Wed, 26 May 2004 09:45:07 -0700	35 lines
Re: use of module elements - is this legal?	Wed, 26 May 2004 17:48:47 +0100	66 lines
Re: use of module elements - is this legal?	Wed, 26 May 2004 12:00:44 -0500	263 lines
[ANN] F90 for f77 programmers course material available	Thu, 27 May 2004 12:02:42 +0200	50 lines
Re: use of module elements - is this legal?	Thu, 27 May 2004 14:06:17 -0700	28 lines
Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:01:35 +0200	49 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:24:38 -0400	18 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:11:39 -0700	58 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:22:30 +0200	24 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:27:00 +0200	104 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:12:57 -0400	25 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:28:44 +0200	53 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:34:05 -0400	21 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:42:15 -0700	33 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:16:03 -0400	20 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:37:20 -0700	53 lines
Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function	Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:19:54 +0200	34 lines
STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:49:12 -0400	24 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:44:55 -0500	71 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:22:57 -0400	25 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:54:58 -0700	41 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:28:14 -0400	24 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:31:42 -0700	82 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:08:32 -0600	25 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:48:11 -0400	45 lines
When a WRITE statement matters	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:26:24 -0400	21 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:29:34 -0700	96 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:46:58 +1000	39 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:52:29 -0700	79 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:45:54 -0700	46 lines
Re: STOP guarantees	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:13:26 +0100	44 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:37:21 +0200	29 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:01:49 -0400	22 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:36:04 -0700	27 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:08:33 -0700	138 lines
Re: When a WRITE statement matters	Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:29:51 +1000	30 lines
language lawyer needed re illegal array indices	Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:42:09 -0700	25 lines
Re: language lawyer needed re illegal array indices	Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:25:42 +0100	50 lines
Fortran 95/2003 Explained (announcement)	Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:15:25 +0100	93 lines
ASSOCIATED	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:33:16 -0400	51 lines
Re: ASSOCIATED	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:51:14 -0700	52 lines
Re: ASSOCIATED	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:23:33 -0600	29 lines
Re: ASSOCIATED	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:30:15 -0400	31 lines
Re: ASSOCIATED	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:32:19 -0700	27 lines
Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:43:58 +0100	19 lines
Fortran Resources (June)	Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:57:28 -0400	820 lines
Re: Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences	Wed, 23 Jun 2004 05:43:03 -0500	24 lines
Re: Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences	Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:55:49 +0100	81 lines
review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot?	Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:35:01 -0700	54 lines
Re: review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot?	Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:55:24 -0700	45 lines
Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:21:48 -0400	55 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:24:57 -0700	33 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:45:00 -0500	133 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:53:58 -0400	66 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:22:11 -0400	45 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:23:49 -0500	56 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:00:17 -0600	26 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:41:21 -0400	17 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:42:26 -0700	138 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:02:10 -0700	72 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:07:02 -0400	45 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:22:24 -0600	33 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:31:44 -0700	45 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:19:15 -0700	62 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:15:52 +0200	221 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:07:04 +0200	61 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:15:52 +1000	111 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 06:06:00 -0700	23 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:28:42 -0400	37 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:33:51 -0400	41 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:09:53 -0600	29 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:41:09 +0200	77 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:34:34 -0700	47 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:41:46 -0700	101 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:10:10 -0600	47 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:05:56 -0700	34 lines
My two cents RE: "ANDTHEN", "ORELSE"	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:48:09 -0700	33 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:35:05 +0200	114 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:51:52 +0200	83 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:48:51 +1000	95 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:36:37 +0100	26 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:57:17 -0500	46 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:49:59 -0700	47 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:59:07 -0700	46 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 02:27:22 -0400	66 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:02:22 +1000	42 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:06:09 -0400	33 lines
anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:58:12 +0100	226 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:28:13 -0700	197 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:38:39 -0400	51 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:42:29 -0400	28 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:05 -0500	163 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:49:45 +0200	29 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:26:14 -0700	18 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:41:16 -0700	34 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:45:51 -0700	119 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:07:24 -0400	47 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:08:27 -0700	49 lines
ANDTHEN, ORELSE as functions?	Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:21:46 -0700	20 lines
Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems	Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:53:58 +0100	51 lines
vms uasge	Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:03:44 +0100	18 lines
Current Usage of OpenVMS (Was: vms uasge)	Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:40:42 -0500	344 lines
Re: vms uasge	Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:15:46 -0700	22 lines
Re: Fortran/C Speed	Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:25:40 -0400	45 lines
Fortran Forum	Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:39:31 -0400	81 lines
derived-type arrays	Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:28:28 -0700	30 lines
Re: derived-type arrays	Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:46:56 -0700	32 lines
Reading a line of bytes one by one	Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:04 -0400	40 lines
Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one	Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:05:00 -0400	40 lines
Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one	Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:27:04 +1000	56 lines
Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one	Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:58:53 +0800	32 lines
referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays	Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:20:49 +0100	41 lines
Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays	Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:46 -0500	23 lines
Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays	Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:33:48 -0400	47 lines
Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays	Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:51:54 +0000	51 lines
Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays	Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:17:39 +1000	55 lines
Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays	Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:37:21 +1000	37 lines
Re: vms uasge	Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:42:50 +0200	39 lines
f90 paranoia benchmark	Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:45:00 -0700	37 lines
Re: f90 paranoia benchmark	Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:07:21 -0500	63 lines
pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:55:56 +0200	33 lines
Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:32:38 +0200	15 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:00:08 -0400	22 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:45:41 -0700	49 lines
Re: PB WITH INTRINSIC FUNCTION AND PARAMETER	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:33:29 +1000	39 lines
Re: PB WITH INTRINSIC FUNCTION AND PARAMETER	Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:42:33 -0700	26 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:52:25 +0200	54 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:03:36 +0200	53 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:12:22 +0200	27 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:09:41 +0200	43 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:18:09 -0400	37 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:43:25 -0700	34 lines
Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter	Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:42:03 +0200	28 lines
F90 problem	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:03:56 -0400	61 lines
Re: F90 problem	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:33:10 -0700	40 lines
Re: F90 problem	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:50:56 +0300	46 lines
Re: F90 problem	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:48:49 -0600	42 lines
Quick g77 question	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:39:00 -0400	24 lines
Re: Quick g77 question	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:48:09 +0300	50 lines
Re: Quick g77 question	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:49:37 -0700	52 lines
Announcement: IBM XL Fortran Enterprise Edition V9.1 for AIX is now available	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:56:40 -0400	52 lines
Re: Quick g77 question	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:59:20 -0400	27 lines
question about allocatable array components (TR 15581)	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:18:48 -0400	58 lines
Re: question about allocatable array components (TR 15581)	Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:30:02 -0400	41 lines
Re: Quick g77 question	Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:35:51 +0100	33 lines
Re: Quick g77 question	Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:51:09 -0700	36 lines
Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:50:08 +0100	34 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:04:42 -0400	53 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:26:32 +0100	38 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:02:05 -0400	41 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:39:02 -0400	127 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:45:54 -0700	66 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:23:20 -0700	31 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:42:23 -0700	27 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:43:31 -0400	40 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:21:04 +0800	31 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:51:38 -0400	55 lines
Re: Style question	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:24:49 -0700	123 lines
FW: [Fwd: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3158) DTR vote result]	Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:04:02 +0100	54 lines
Re: Style question	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:21:21 +1000	42 lines
Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:31:01 -0400	29 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:46:47 -0400	36 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:49:52 -0600	49 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:53:52 -0700	42 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:58:32 -0600	39 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:09:52 -0600	50 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:30:01 -0700	66 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:41:08 -0600	37 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:42:36 -0500	159 lines
Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 21:13:15 -0400	16 lines
Generic interfaces for function arguments	Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:00:28 -0400	39 lines
Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments	Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:27:02 -0500	41 lines
Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments	Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:28:05 -0700	73 lines
Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments	Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:04:24 -0400	65 lines
Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments	Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:17:17 -0700	87 lines
Long names with Absoft	Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:27:07 -0400	23 lines
Re: Long names with Absoft	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:39:47 -0400	151 lines
Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:12:05 -0400	105 lines
Re: Long names with Absoft	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:40:30 +0300	59 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:59:17 -0400	23 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:31:03 +0200	59 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:34:40 -0400	37 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:13:38 -0700	21 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:05:04 -0700	24 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:19:12 -0400	18 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:23:17 -0700	17 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:21:02 +0200	38 lines
Re: Long names on IA32/64	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:23:15 -0400	28 lines
Generic resolution with CHARACTER	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:07:03 -0400	28 lines
Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:13:17 -0400	46 lines
Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:24:19 -0700	64 lines
Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:40:09 -0400	56 lines
Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:02:29 -0700	43 lines
IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT)	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:17:50 -0400	40 lines
Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:19:40 -0400	21 lines
Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER	Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:46:27 -0700	46 lines
5 Day Course - Scientific Programming with Fortran 95	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:59:28 +0100	57 lines
Re: IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT)	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:20:37 +0200	69 lines
SSE2 instructions experiences	Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:49:03 -0400	44 lines
Re: SSE2 instructions experiences	Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:24:40 -0700	41 lines
Fortran Resources (Last Issue)	Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:23:55 +0100	818 lines
Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:31:12 -0400	35 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:15:05 -0400	54 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:36:44 -0400	53 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:20:43 -0700	78 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:32:03 -0400	40 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:54:34 -0700	39 lines
Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:59:35 -0400	33 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:46:02 -0400	26 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:50:47 -0700	71 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:59:39 -0700	35 lines
Data structures question	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:03:28 -0400	52 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:11:51 +0100	34 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:15:09 -0500	50 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:16:11 -0400	31 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:29:17 -0700	42 lines
creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:31:16 -0700	52 lines
g77 compiler?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:33:17 -0700	26 lines
Re: Data structures question	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:36:22 -0700	36 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:53:38 -0700	34 lines
Re: g77 compiler?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:54:48 -0400	27 lines
Re: g77 compiler?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:58:56 -0400	25 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:00:42 -0700	48 lines
Re: g77 compiler?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:02:25 -0700	32 lines
Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:03:12 +0200	42 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:15:14 -0400	22 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:25:28 -0700	39 lines
Re: Data structures question	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:30:03 -0600	44 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:52:47 -0600	50 lines
Re: Data structures question	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:57:20 -0400	73 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:05:16 -0400	55 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:05:48 -0700	47 lines
Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:21:49 -0700	33 lines
Re: g77 compiler?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:21:57 +0200	32 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:29:49 -0700	39 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:08:30 -0600	92 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:22:57 -0600	44 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:39:59 -0700	136 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:04:04 +0200	57 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:11:14 -0700	31 lines
Re: Data structures question	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:14:31 -0600	138 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:24:40 -0600	46 lines
Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:27:49 -0400	21 lines
Re: Data structures question	Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:47:50 -0400	42 lines
Re: g77 compiler?	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:01:51 +0100	86 lines
Re: g77 compiler?	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:59:42 -0700	39 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:44:06 +0100	37 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:47:42 -0400	22 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:25:17 +0100	55 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:45:37 -0400	29 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:54:04 -0400	38 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:07:16 +0300	46 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:09:40 +0300	70 lines
"Fortran 95/2003 Explained" (Errata)	Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:23:08 +0100	19 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:55:08 -0700	47 lines
Re: creating i++ operator in F90?	Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:21:30 -0600	89 lines
Direct data access in F from Excel	Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:33:19 -0700	23 lines
Re: Direct data access in F from Excel	Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:04:06 -0700	39 lines
Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:18:37 -0400	19 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:23:07 +0100	32 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:28:01 -0400	32 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:38:49 -0700	51 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:44:00 +0200	38 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:48:54 -0700	32 lines
Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:10:50 -0700	76 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:27:07 -0600	32 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:32:02 -0400	28 lines
Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:38:36 -0400	69 lines
Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:45:37 -0700	58 lines
Re: Writing to string buffer	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:53:01 -0700	31 lines
Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:50:27 -0700	88 lines
Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:33:20 -0700	28 lines
Precision in F90	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:54:23 +0100	14 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:34:58 -0700	28 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:58:09 +0000	40 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:00:07 +0100	19 lines
Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion	Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:12:42 -0700	46 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:00:54 -0700	44 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:05:16 -0700	29 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:13:44 +1000	51 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:55:25 -0600	46 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:47:18 -0700	32 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:35:45 -0700	36 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:43:55 +0000	41 lines
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:32:21 +0100	45 lines
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:32:21 +0100	29 lines
Execution monitoring system	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:43:43 -0400	322 lines
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:32:21 -0700	62 lines
Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:32:48 -0700	104 lines
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:06:58 +0100	21 lines
Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:21:23 -0700	33 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:15:34 +1000	54 lines
Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines	Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:52:22 +0100	17 lines
Re: Precision in F90	Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:57:29 +1000	57 lines
Fw: Fortran Tutorials	Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:29:00 +0100	25 lines
AW: Fortran Tutorials	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:11:31 +0200	40 lines
Re: Fortran Tutorials	Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:10:30 +0100	21 lines
quickwin font set	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:02:29 +0200	63 lines
ibits question	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:38:48 -0600	23 lines
Re: ibits question	Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:52:35 +0100	33 lines
Re: ibits question	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:02:51 -0600	25 lines
Re: ibits question	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:12:07 -0700	37 lines
Re: ibits question	Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:33:02 +0000	54 lines
Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004	Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:48:03 -0400	28 lines
Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004	Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:00:50 -0700	46 lines
Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004	Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:10:01 -0700	61 lines
Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004	Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:50:30 -0700	29 lines
Fortran 90 refactoring tools	Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:27:33 +0200	38 lines
Re: Fortran 90 refactoring tools	Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:25:47 +0100	27 lines
Fortran 2003 standard publication date	Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:59:47 +0100	19 lines
Re: Fortran 2003 standard publication date	Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:04:16 -0700	31 lines
Does anybody have a copy of ANSI x3.21?	Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:31:00 -0700	16 lines
Re: Fortran 2003 standard publication date	Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:16:41 +0100	44 lines
legal code?	Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:53:11 -0700	67 lines
Re: legal code?	Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:18:56 -0500	48 lines
Re: Fortran 90 refactoring tools	Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:38:24 +0100	50 lines
error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Sat, 6 Nov 2004 10:16:08 -0500	60 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:36:20 -0000	23 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:58:52 -0000	100 lines
Re: error of rand with Intel FORTRAN compiler	Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:47:08 -0800	53 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Sun, 7 Nov 2004 00:12:32 -0500	52 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:51:49 -0500	30 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:20:07 -0800	37 lines
NAMELIST formatting question	Sun, 7 Nov 2004 23:30:00 -0500	43 lines
files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:04:53 -0000	116 lines
Re: files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:27:37 +0000	44 lines
Re: files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 07:43:51 -0800	46 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:16:41 -0800	52 lines
Re: NAMELIST formatting question	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:24:11 -0800	33 lines
Re: NAMELIST formatting question	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:37:41 -0800	57 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:47:44 -0800	39 lines
Re: NAMELIST formatting question	Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:29:41 -0600	173 lines
Ieee 754 query	Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:22:46 -0000	20 lines
Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler	Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:07:49 -0700	49 lines
test: ignore	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:05:58 +0200	7 lines
problem with function as argument of procedure	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:22:42 +0200	62 lines
TEST---IGNORE	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:58:33 +0200	8 lines
Re: problem with function as argument of procedure	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:35:45 +0200	58 lines
Re: problem with function as argument of procedure	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:57:14 +0200	23 lines
Re: problem with function as argument of procedure	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:47:51 -0500	22 lines
Re: problem with function as argument of procedure	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:22:54 +0900	96 lines
Re: problem with function as argument of procedure	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:36:29 +0200	77 lines
Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:13:03 -0600	20 lines
Re: problem with function as argument of procedure	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:58:28 -0800	73 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:52:30 -0500	33 lines
Re: Deallocating array pointers	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:18:55 -0800	68 lines
Re: Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution	Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:46:40 +0100	41 lines
Re: problem with function as argument of procedure	Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:57:25 +0200	16 lines
qwin-console cursor jump	Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:14:00 +0100	15 lines
Confusing timing results	Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:14:29 -0500	224 lines
bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:57:06 +1100	61 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:49:36 -0800	71 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:10:37 -0800	23 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:20:45 +0200	26 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:52:54 +1100	49 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:25:37 -0800	45 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:45:01 -0800	27 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:12:20 +0200	37 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:57:26 -0500	34 lines
Re: bugs everywhere	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:20:36 -0500	32 lines
g95 runs on Windows	Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:43:00 -0800	57 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:56:00 +0100	32 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:59:27 -0700	156 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:03:42 -0700	196 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:11:38 -0000	28 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:08:50 +0200	19 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:00:55 -0800	52 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:22:51 -0500	27 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:59:42 +0100	32 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:16:27 +0100	39 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows XP	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:25:01 +0100	40 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:20:23 -0800	38 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:04:05 -0800	42 lines
a quick question	Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:14:53 -0500	22 lines
Re: a quick question	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:18:46 +1000	61 lines
Re: a quick question	Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:09:43 -0800	41 lines
IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:22:08 -0500	22 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:49:18 -0800	57 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:56:14 -0500	27 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:12:16 -0800	46 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:20:59 -0500	37 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:48:29 -0600	91 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:56:29 -0600	100 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:22:26 -0800	66 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:06:38 -0800	49 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:17:36 -0800	33 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:03:28 -0800	67 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:25:21 -0800	57 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:44:13 -0500	27 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:54:50 -0800	111 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:22:52 -0600	71 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:27:56 -0800	49 lines
Re: IO buffer overflow	Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:47:32 -0700	44 lines
Forpedo: A Preprocessor for Fortran Generics	Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:10:40 +0100	39 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:41:38 +0100	33 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:55:29 -0800	21 lines
Which compiler on IA64?	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:50:05 +0100	17 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:45:04 -0500	35 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:02:15 -0800	22 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:31:33 -0500	33 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:51:53 -0500	25 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:03:49 -0800	17 lines
FlexLM on Itanium?	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:04:50 -0500	39 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:00:36 +0100	38 lines
Re: g95 runs on Windows	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:37:04 -0800	38 lines
bug in g95 ?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:23:55 +0100	35 lines
Is this recursive?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:40:37 +0000	35 lines
Re: Is this recursive?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:35 +0100	58 lines
F2003 has been published	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:21:41 +0000	28 lines
Re: bug in g95 ?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:59:00 +0100	53 lines
Re: bug in g95 ?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:14:59 +0100	21 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:32:52 +0100	32 lines
Re: bug in g95 ?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:59:35 +0100	65 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:11:09 -0800	36 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:12:53 -0500	20 lines
Re: bug in g95 ?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:14:20 -0800	28 lines
Re: Which compiler on IA64?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:16:57 -0500	20 lines
Re: F2003 has been published	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:33:37 -0800	40 lines
Re: bug in g95 ?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:34:04 +0100	44 lines
bug in G95 with Reshape	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:38:35 +0100	47 lines
Re: bug in g95 ?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:41:38 -0600	51 lines
Re: Is this recursive?	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:55:36 -0800	83 lines
Re: F2003 has been published	Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:19:02 +1000	80 lines
Re: F2003 has been published	Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:32:22 -0800	100 lines
Re: F2003 has been published [OT]	Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:14:33 +0200	45 lines
Re: F2003 has been published	Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:25:42 +0000	103 lines
Creation of a variable in a Module	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:18:13 +0000	26 lines
Re: Creation of a variable in a Module	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:42:02 -0000	75 lines
Re: Creation of a variable in a Module	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:11:51 -0500	27 lines
Re: Creation of a variable in a Module	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:23:22 +0000	39 lines
Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors?	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:48:08 -0800	74 lines
Re: Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors?	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:53:11 -0500	22 lines
(random) Signal handling question	Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:31:36 -0500	25 lines
add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?	Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:33:36 -0800	31 lines
Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?	Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:06:52 -0500	27 lines
Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?	Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:38:25 -0600	34 lines
Default initialize a local variable	Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:40:25 -0500	25 lines
Re: Default initialize a local variable	Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:09:30 +0000	44 lines
Re: Default initialize a local variable	Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:07:52 -0500	26 lines
Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:12:43 +1000	23 lines
Rewind and end of file	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:21:05 +0100	87 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:25:17 +0100	72 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:27:03 -0500	29 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:39:46 +0100	60 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:52:40 -0500	35 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:17:24 +0100	32 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:32:27 -0800	86 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:40:47 +0200	48 lines
Re: Rewind and end of file	Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:43:52 +0100	90 lines
	Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:43:08 +0200	60 lines
	Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:17:51 -0800	74 lines
Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:45:11 +0000	36 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:00:41 +0200	74 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:57:45 -0800	62 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:03:31 +0000	105 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:19:48 -0500	25 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:23:37 -0500	44 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:30:58 -0500	25 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:36:36 -0500	42 lines
Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:56:58 -0800	38 lines

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

2004

Options

Subject

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives