|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Certain Sonnets
|
Carol V. Kaske |
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:55:23 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Certain Sonnets
|
Germaine Warkentin |
Fri, 06 Oct 2000 18:00:26 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Certain Sonnets
|
A.C. HAMILTON |
Sat, 07 Oct 2000 06:15:36 -0400 |
29 lines |
New Hamilton FQ?
|
Dan Lochman |
Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:03:39 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Anne Prescott |
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 13:57:45 -0400 (EDT) |
29 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
A.C. HAMILTON |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 04:49:09 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Peter Zenner |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:53:35 +0100 |
33 lines |
Hamilton's *FQ*
|
Daniel Traister |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:38:54 -0400 (EDT) |
21 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Consuelo Concepcion |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:26:44 -0700 (PDT) |
65 lines |
Re: Hamilton's *FQ*
|
A.C. HAMILTON |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:46:49 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
A.C. HAMILTON |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:16:32 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Carol V. Kaske |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:06:36 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Peter Zenner |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:30:29 +0100 |
78 lines |
Spenser author of SC?
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:34:39 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter C. Herman |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:50:08 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Carol V. Kaske |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:31:34 -0400 |
81 lines |
RE: Spenser author of SC?
|
Andy Green |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:54:14 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Peter Zenner |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:45:51 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter Zenner |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:15:01 +0100 |
63 lines |
RE: Spenser author of SC?
|
Andy Green |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:41:30 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Consuelo Concepcion |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) |
63 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
A.C. HAMILTON |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:16:36 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Anne Prescott |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:38:14 -0400 (EDT) |
41 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Anne Prescott |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:57:54 -0400 (EDT) |
67 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter C. Herman |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:00:30 -0700 |
95 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Roger Kuin |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:53:55 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Clark Hulse |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:33:26 -0500 |
98 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Roger Kuin |
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 22:02:32 -0400 |
130 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Clark Hulse |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:24:17 -0500 |
151 lines |
Re: Recordings of Sidney's Songs
|
Peter C. Herman |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:37:32 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Recordings of Sidney's Songs
|
Roger Kuin |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:05:01 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Recordings of Sidney's Songs
|
Roger Kuin |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:06:01 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Recordings of Sidney's Songs
|
Roger Kuin |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:07:34 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Re: Recordings of Sidney's Songs
|
<> |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:19:18 EDT |
21 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:20:36 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: Recordings of Sidney's Songs
|
tom bishop |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:23:15 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:37:10 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:47:14 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:58:51 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter Zenner |
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 01:04:22 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Recordings of Sidney's Songs
|
Dan Lochman |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:06:28 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Peter Zenner |
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 11:04:13 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 17:07:15 +0200 |
116 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 17:12:34 +0200 |
70 lines |
RE: Spenser author of SC?
|
Jean R. Brink |
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:16:38 -0700 |
127 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter C. Herman |
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:57:46 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Anne Prescott |
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 23:41:27 -0400 (EDT) |
165 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Anne Prescott |
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:00:35 -0400 (EDT) |
65 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Anne Prescott |
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:02:48 -0400 (EDT) |
37 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Anne Prescott |
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:07:24 -0400 (EDT) |
74 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter Zenner |
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 11:53:52 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: New Hamilton FQ?
|
Peter Zenner |
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 12:15:56 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Dr Susan C Oldrieve |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 02:01:55 -0400 (EDT) |
44 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:49:04 +0200 |
86 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Carol V. Kaske |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:25:27 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Dr Susan C Oldrieve |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:29:26 -0400 (EDT) |
49 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 22:13:56 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Anne Prescott |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:03:45 -0400 (EDT) |
49 lines |
RE: Spenser author of SC?
|
Andy Green |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:44:07 +0100 |
73 lines |
Matriculation date
|
Jameela Lares |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:57:11 -0500 (CDT) |
35 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 02:03:04 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: Matriculation date
|
<> |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:06:28 EDT |
30 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
<> |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:14:49 EDT |
20 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:50:26 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:58:35 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Steven J. Willett |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:06:49 +0900 |
151 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:08:52 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Dan Lochman |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:57:22 -0500 |
47 lines |
The Shepheardes Calender
|
Andy Green |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:52:13 +0100 |
37 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
Andy Green |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:46:23 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Thomas Herron |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:19:55 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:27:41 +0200 |
56 lines |
Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Yngve Nordgård |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:43:52 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:07:34 +0200 |
76 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Peter Zenner |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 23:43:42 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Peter Zenner |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 23:43:42 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Spenser author of SC?
|
Peter Zenner |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 23:44:01 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Peter Zenner |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 23:44:37 +0100 |
136 lines |
Re: The Shepheardes Calender
|
Peter Zenner |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 23:45:14 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Marshall Grossman |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:53:40 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
48 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Dr Susan C Oldrieve |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:40:09 -0400 (EDT) |
27 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Steven J. Willett |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:16:16 +0900 |
118 lines |
Re: The Shepheardes Calender
|
tom bishop |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:26:31 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Peter Zenner |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:51:11 +0100 |
32 lines |
RE: Spenser author of SC?
|
Andy Green |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:05:33 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Peter Zenner |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:08:04 +0100 |
57 lines |
RE: The Shepheardes Calender
|
Andy Green |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:17:37 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: The Shepheardes Calender
|
Peter Zenner |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:18:19 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:07:14 +0200 |
77 lines |
future is the tense of desire?
|
w. l. godshalk |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:13:52 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:49:25 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:01:27 +0200 |
23 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
Andy Green |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:01:45 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: The term "anapodoton"
|
Steven J. Willett |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:39:18 +0900 |
40 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:15:34 +0200 |
61 lines |
RE: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Colin Burrow |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:19:26 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: The term "anapodoton"
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:30:14 +0200 |
66 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
David Howard |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:31:43 +1300 |
31 lines |
Re: Divine Frenzy
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:34:07 +0200 |
35 lines |
RE: Divine Frenzy
|
Andy Green |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:02:33 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:12:29 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
<> |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:14:05 EDT |
43 lines |
Re: The Shepheardes Calender
|
tom bishop |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:08:14 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: The Shepheardes Calender
|
tom bishop |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:26:34 -0500 |
19 lines |
Divine Frenzy
|
David Howard |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:35:53 +1300 |
63 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
Carol V. Kaske |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:14:31 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Carol V. Kaske |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:29:56 -0400 |
53 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:30:54 +0200 |
34 lines |
desire and fulfillment in the present
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:33:07 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Peter Zenner |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:27:30 +0100 |
27 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
John Webster |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:31:01 -0700 (PDT) |
52 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
d. m. frances batycki |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:35:31 -0600 |
21 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Dr. Sujata Iyengar |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:55:44 -0400 |
48 lines |
Reminder of List Guidelines
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:24:21 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:37:38 -0400 |
39 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:39:20 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Peter C. Herman |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:44:14 -0700 |
47 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
tom bishop |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:46:25 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:21:21 -0400 |
33 lines |
Milton's wanting soul
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:33:21 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
tom bishop |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:42:08 -0500 |
36 lines |
hoping and having
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:28:48 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Anne Coldiron |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:38:36 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
tom bishop |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:45:36 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: hoping and having
|
tom bishop |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:36:27 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
John Leonard |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:55:56 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:40:15 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:45:23 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Re: affectionate shepherds
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:46:15 +0100 |
66 lines |
tomorrow never comes
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:04:35 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
zurch |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:19:44 +0100 (BST) |
73 lines |
Re: tomorrow never comes
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:20:14 -0400 |
16 lines |
book
|
george klawitter |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:26:10 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: book
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:10:20 +0200 |
56 lines |
Lacan may be wrong
|
w. l. godshalk |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:36:57 -0400 |
36 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:39:20 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: book
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:50:07 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: tomorrow never comes
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:50:19 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: tomorrow never comes
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:32:45 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Lacan may be wrong
|
Vance Pitman |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:54:13 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Lacan may be wrong
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:55:42 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: tomorrow never comes
|
tom bishop |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:55:25 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: book
|
verulan |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:56:26 -0700 |
20 lines |
wanting, lacking, desiring, and needing, etc.
|
w. l. godshalk |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:10:15 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: tomorrow never comes
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:41:47 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
David Lee Miller |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:33:57 -0400 |
189 lines |
Re: wanting, lacking, desiring, and needing, etc.
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 21:28:51 +0200 |
33 lines |
Steiner?
|
verulan |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:44:30 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: de-siring and dy-ing
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:22:16 +0200 |
47 lines |
presence, cognition, and emotion
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 21:47:33 +0100 |
103 lines |
Re: Lacan may be wrong
|
Marshall Grossman |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 21:27:47 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
92 lines |
Re: book
|
David Jepson |
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 08:22:30 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: book
|
verulan |
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 08:05:10 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: desire and ontology
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:24:51 +0200 |
116 lines |
Re: desire and ontology
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:46:00 +0200 |
24 lines |
The Lacan-can
|
Steven J. Willett |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 15:22:07 +0900 |
158 lines |
Re: desire and ontology
|
Steven J. Willett |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 15:36:44 +0900 |
58 lines |
Re: the reed and orpharion
|
Sharon-zisser Shirle |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 11:45:01 +0200 |
46 lines |
genitives
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 09:37:09 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: The Lacan-can
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 09:56:16 -0400 |
22 lines |
Help me off this list!!!!
|
Gina Michelle Granter |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:07:59 -0300 |
26 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
d. m. frances batycki |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:31:36 -0600 |
23 lines |
Re: Milton's wanting soul
|
d. m. frances batycki |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:44:49 -0600 |
20 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:04:16 +0200 |
111 lines |
Lacanian metaphors?
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 17:12:08 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Milton's wanting soul
|
John Leonard |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 17:38:44 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Milton's wanting soul
|
Marshall Grossman |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 18:28:34 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
73 lines |
Re: Milton's wanting soul
|
Peter C. Herman |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:23:15 -0700 |
82 lines |
Re: The Lacan-can
|
Steven J. Willett |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:39:12 +0900 |
115 lines |
Re: Lacanian metaphors? (fwd)
|
Sharon-zisser Shirle |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:29:23 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: Milton's wanting soul (fwd)
|
Sharon-zisser Shirle |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:30:16 +0200 |
104 lines |
Re: The Lacan-can (fwd)
|
Sharon-zisser Shirle |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:30:40 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Lacanian metaphors?
|
Marshall Grossman |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:24:47 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
131 lines |
Re: Milton's wanting soul
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:38:53 -0400 |
21 lines |
...
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:55:39 -0400 |
22 lines |
RE: the reed and orpharion
|
Andy Green |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:13:10 +0100 |
56 lines |
RE: affectionate shepherds
|
Andy Green |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:13:12 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Milton's wanting soul
|
John Leonard |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:51:37 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Lacanian metaphors?
|
Steven J. Willett |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:38:03 +0900 |
61 lines |
Nonconceptual schemes meet unthinking readers
|
Steven J. Willett |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:55:46 +0900 |
71 lines |
Psychoanalysis etc...
|
Andy Green |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:28:13 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Psychoanalysis/Euphuism/music/poetry/rhetoric etc...
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:21:03 +0200 |
28 lines |
Query for a Book on Lacan
|
Ellen Moody |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:12:29 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Anne Prescott |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:17:26 -0400 (EDT) |
53 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Jameela Lares |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:30:35 -0500 (CDT) |
67 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Anne Prescott |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:46:35 -0400 (EDT) |
89 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Anne Prescott |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:40:11 -0400 (EDT) |
80 lines |
Re: book
|
Anne Prescott |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:06:33 -0400 (EDT) |
88 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Sharon-zisser Shirle |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:47:06 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: book
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:50:29 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: book
|
Sharon-zisser Shirle |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:09:19 +0200 |
124 lines |
Re: Query for a Book on Lacan
|
Consuelo Concepcion |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:22:51 -0700 (PDT) |
39 lines |
How do I unsubscribe
|
<> |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:34:52 EDT |
25 lines |
How I unsubscribe and get away from Lacan
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:47:27 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: How do I unsubscribe
|
<> |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:49:57 EDT |
19 lines |
Re: How do I unsubscribe
|
Germaine Warkentin |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:14:33 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: How do I unsubscribe
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 23:20:06 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: Spenser's use of Song of Salomo -- which Bible?
|
Carol V. Kaske |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:40:40 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: future is the tense of desire?
|
Steven J. Willett |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:15:30 +0900 |
124 lines |
John Dickenson
|
Gavin Alexander |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:56:05 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: John Dickenson
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:05:00 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Query for a Book on Lacan
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:08:12 +0200 |
22 lines |
RE: the reed and orpharion
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:18:13 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: Lacanian metaphors?
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:35:17 +0200 |
42 lines |
archaic magic
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:20:31 +0200 |
25 lines |
darkening counsel
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:54:47 -0500 |
27 lines |
RE: the reed and orpharion
|
Anne Prescott |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:31:24 -0400 (EDT) |
39 lines |
Re: archaic magic
|
Anne Prescott |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:48:58 -0400 (EDT) |
49 lines |
Re: Lacanian metaphors?
|
Marshall Grossman |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:12:15 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
63 lines |
RE: the reed and orpharion
|
Andy Green |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:32:15 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: archaic magic
|
w. l. godshalk |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:46:21 -0400 |
24 lines |
Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
j.k. leonard |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:23:43 -0400 (EDT) |
29 lines |
Re: presence, cognition, and emotion
|
Elizabeth Fowler |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:38:18 -0400 |
123 lines |
RE: the reed and orpharion
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:01:33 +0200 |
25 lines |
RE: the reed and orpharion
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:16:32 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: archaic magic
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:44:53 +0200 |
95 lines |
Re: Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
Anne Prescott |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:25:43 -0400 (EDT) |
57 lines |
Re: nymphs' genders
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 00:19:07 +0200 |
20 lines |
Brimful Venus
|
Thomas Herron |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:37:06 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
John Leonard |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 21:46:21 -0400 |
34 lines |
Gay Marlowe?
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:31:02 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
Peter C. Herman |
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:28:01 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
Peter Zenner |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:59:44 +0100 |
34 lines |
second thoughts on kirtles
|
John Leonard |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:55:01 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
george klawitter |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:45:36 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe?
|
Robert Darcy |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:18:37 -0400 |
163 lines |
Re: second thoughts on kirtles
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:32:29 -0400 |
16 lines |
Query
|
verulan |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:03:43 -0700 |
20 lines |
Marlowe's atheism
|
Robert Darcy |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:40:01 -0400 |
53 lines |
[forward from William Oram]
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:09:55 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe?
|
Clark Hulse |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:46:48 -0500 |
149 lines |
Re: Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
William Oram |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:52:04 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Query about Bacon
|
Robert Darcy |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:56:50 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: the object
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:57:15 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: pastoral gifts
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 20:45:27 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe?
|
Robert Darcy |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 14:56:54 -0400 |
312 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe?
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:07:51 -0400 |
63 lines |
Gay Marlowe? -- mistake
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:28:40 -0400 |
28 lines |
the object
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 22:11:18 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: the object
|
Sara Hillis |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:57 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Query about Bacon
|
verulan |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:12:33 -0700 |
180 lines |
Re: Query about Bacon
|
verulan |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:34:51 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: the object
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:10:57 +0200 |
29 lines |
imaginary interpellations
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:33:12 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe?
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:52:30 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: second thoughts on kirtles
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:59:00 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Nymphs' hats (was archaic magic)
|
Peter Zenner |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:19:04 +0100 |
43 lines |
RE: imaginary interpellations
|
Andy Green |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:24:16 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe?
|
Anne Prescott |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:04:14 -0400 (EDT) |
166 lines |
Re: the object
|
Anne Prescott |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:25:06 -0400 (EDT) |
48 lines |
Re: the object
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Sat, 28 Oct 2000 08:45:12 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: the object
|
Robert Darcy |
Sat, 28 Oct 2000 13:47:04 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: the object
|
Sharon-zisser Shirle |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:28:00 +0200 |
126 lines |
RE: the object
|
Andy Green |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:16:45 -0000 |
66 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe, Hemp, Bacon and Henri III
|
Thomas Herron |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:59:34 -0600 |
64 lines |
Re: the object
|
Sara Hillis |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:27:39 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: the object
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:39:38 +0200 |
23 lines |
Marlowe's Many Manifestations--a few questions.
|
Sara Hillis |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:16:14 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Gay Marlowe, Hemp, Bacon and Henri III
|
Peter Zenner |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:33:51 -0000 |
116 lines |
Re: Marlowe's Many Manifestations--a few questions.
|
Peter Zenner |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:12:22 -0000 |
84 lines |
RE: the aesthetics of humanist politics (on behalf of Oded Ilan)
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:13:26 +0200 |
92 lines |
RE: the object
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:44:24 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Marlowe's Many Manifestations--a few questions.
|
Sara Hillis |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:58:18 -0500 |
19 lines |
Christopher Marlowe; International Man Of Mystery!
|
Sara Hillis |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:33:54 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Marlowe's Many Manifestations--a few questions.
|
Peter Zenner |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:58:10 -0000 |
45 lines |
RE: Christopher Marlowe; International Man Of Mystery!
|
Andy Green |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:41:02 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Christopher Marlowe; International Man Of Mystery!
|
Peter Zenner |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:43:11 -0000 |
100 lines |
Re: Marlowe's Many Manifestations--a few questions.
|
Stephen Whitworth |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:38:54 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: for Bob Darcy, with ellipsis and unparenthetical hope
|
shirley sharon-zisser |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:45:33 +0200 |
149 lines |
FORWARD FROM MARSHALL GROSSMAN
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:02:07 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: FORWARD FROM MARSHALL GROSSMAN
|
tom bishop |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:25:10 -0500 |
37 lines |
(for Sharon-Zisser, others may delete)
|
Robert Darcy |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:42:33 -0500 |
206 lines |
Good Use Policy
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:47:58 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: FORWARD FROM MARSHALL GROSSMAN
|
David Lee Miller |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:25:32 -0500 |
48 lines |
Spenser in the visual arts
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:25:49 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: FORWARD FROM MARSHALL GROSSMAN
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:26:30 +0000 |
48 lines |
RE: Good Use Policy
|
Andy Green |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:14:07 -0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Spenser in the visual arts
|
A.C. HAMILTON |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:37:39 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Good Use Policy
|
Marshall Grossman |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:43:35 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) |
81 lines |
Re: List Use
|
Peter Zenner |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:37:20 -0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Spenser in the visual arts
|
A.C. HAMILTON |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:41:42 -0500 |
63 lines |
RE: Spenser in the visual arts
|
Colin Burrow |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:32:02 -0000 |
42 lines |
Sorry - I couldn't resist
|
Andy Green |
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:58:24 -0000 |
24 lines |