JISCMail - DRS Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DRS Archives

May 2000

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DRS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
a more ambitious justification of design?	Jean Schneider	Jeu, 18 Mai 00 13:23:25 -0000	213 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Jean Schneider	Ven, 19 Mai 00 09:19:20 -0000	32 lines
Doctor of Graphic Design?	Karel van der Waarde	Mon, 1 May 2000 09:57:04 +0200 (MET DST)	33 lines
Re: Thesis 19: The nature of the philosophical doctorate	Dr. Terence Love	Mon, 1 May 2000 9:00:00	222 lines
Re: Response to Rob Curedale	Dr. Terence Love	Mon, 1 May 2000 9:20:00	50 lines
D.Des. in Graphic Design? Here's where to find them!	Ken Friedman	Mon, 1 May 2000 12:40:52 +0200	256 lines
Five theses on clarity, definition and the formal properties of debate	Ken Friedman	Mon, 1 May 2000 22:12:27 +0200	446 lines
Response to Rob Curedale's Response.	Ken Friedman	Tue, 2 May 2000 19:31:37 +0200	202 lines
Social Science Research and Industrial Design	<>	Wed, 3 May 2000 00:07:51 EDT	108 lines
Anthropology and Design	Conall O Cathain	Wed, 3 May 2000 09:25:20 +0100 ()	99 lines
Anthropology and Design	Miller, Hugh	Wed, 3 May 2000 10:44:02 +0100	102 lines
Anthropology and Design	<>	Wed, 3 May 2000 06:28:49 EDT	159 lines
Re: Anthropology and Design	Susann Vihma	Wed, 3 May 2000 13:45:38 +0300 (EET DST)	29 lines
	Birger Sevaldson	Wed, 03 May 2000 17:05:36 +0200	77 lines
BUILDING A DESIGN RESEARCH COMMUNITY (long post - 16K)	Conall O Cathain	Wed, 3 May 2000 19:50:44 +0100 ()	350 lines
Re: BUILDING A DESIGN RESEARCH COMMUNITY (long post - 16K)	Jesse L Voss	Thu, 4 May 2000 01:20:24 -0500 (CDT)	37 lines
ph.d debate, design research, etc....	aguas	Thu, 4 May 2000 08:08:04 -0700	402 lines
DO NOT OPEN ANY ATTACHMENTS FROM AGUAS	aguas	Thu, 4 May 2000 21:37:01 -0700	26 lines
Important Opportunity for Developing Doctoral Education in Design	Ken Friedman	Fri, 5 May 2000 06:44:41 +0200	211 lines
Design of Inquiry	Harold Nelson	Sat, 06 May 2000 09:39:59 -0700	36 lines
Re: Design of Inquiry	Klaus Krippendorff	Sun, 07 May 2000 08:56:49 -0400	49 lines
Notes on the new design space	Ken Friedman	Mon, 8 May 2000 04:47:16 +0200	457 lines
Re: Design of Inquiry	Harold Nelson	Sun, 07 May 2000 20:39:31 -0700	71 lines
Lecturer/Senior Lecturer position at Loughborough University, UK	Paul Wormald	Mon, 8 May 2000 10:24:36 +0100	39 lines
cancellation	Terry Goodison	Mon, 08 May 2000 14:12:21 +0100	15 lines
DRS: HOW TO LEAVE THE LIST (although I can't imagine why anyone would want to!)	Conall O Cathain	Mon, 8 May 2000 18:32:13 +0100 ()	51 lines
fully-funded PhD studentship	Michael Biggs	Tue, 09 May 2000 13:39:27 +0100	73 lines
Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman	Alec Robertson	Tue, 9 May 2000 19:22:32 +0100	210 lines
REPLY: Response to points from Alec	David Durling	Tue, 09 May 2000 20:38:12 +0100	105 lines
A fish tale	Ken Friedman	Wed, 10 May 2000 05:58:04 +0200	132 lines
Re: Other Disciplines and Design	(Chris RUST(SCS))	Wed, 10 May 2000 08:56:25 +0100	27 lines
Other Disciplines and Design	Dr. Terence Love	Wed, 10 May 2000 9:47:00	85 lines
Sketches	Paul M. Gutherson	Wed, 10 May 2000 11:17:16 +0100	56 lines
Re: Bruce Archer's address	Nigel Cross	Wed, 10 May 2000 12:08:11 +0100	17 lines
Research into Practice conference registration	Michael Biggs	Wed, 10 May 2000 14:35:49 +0100	62 lines
FW: Personal Remarks	Alec Robertson	Wed, 10 May 2000 16:24:10 +0100	79 lines
My Challenge, clarified on a positive note	Beryl Graham	Thu, 11 May 2000 13:21:13 +0800	77 lines
Re: A fish tale	(Mike PRESS(SCS))	Thu, 11 May 2000 14:34:14 +0100	76 lines
Design Inspiration Sources	P.A. Rodgers	Thu, 11 May 2000 15:37:56 +0100 (BST)	48 lines
Re: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note	(Mike PRESS(SCS))	Thu, 11 May 2000 15:47:40 +0100	49 lines
notes on the new design space	john chris jones	Thu, 11 May 2000 15:54:22 +0100	147 lines
Thanks for three good posts	Ken Friedman	Thu, 11 May 2000 21:39:56 +0200	267 lines
On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs	David Durling	Fri, 12 May 2000 08:47:20 +0100	314 lines
Re: On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs	(Mike PRESS(SCS))	Fri, 12 May 2000 11:03:43 +0100	59 lines
Bruce Archer's address	Nigan Bayazit	Fri, 12 May 2000 13:53:13 +0300	29 lines
REPLY: Re: On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs	David Durling	Fri, 12 May 2000 13:55:04 +0100	44 lines
On the dodgy URLs...	David Durling	Sat, 13 May 2000 15:53:57 +0100	55 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	Tim Smithers	Mon, 15 May 2000 10:01:41 +0200	144 lines
Re: Thanks for three good posts	Lubomir S. Popov	Mon, 15 May 2000 12:16:02 -0400	286 lines
Re: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note	Beryl Graham	Tue, 16 May 2000 15:14:49 +0800	97 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	Alec Robertson	Tue, 16 May 2000 10:46:51 +0100	189 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	Tim Smithers	Wed, 17 May 2000 11:00:32 +0200	125 lines
RE: RE Response to point twelve of Ken Friedman ...	Alec Robertson	Wed, 17 May 2000 18:42:51 +0100	195 lines
RE: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note	Klaus Krippendorff	Wed, 17 May 2000 16:22:21 -0400	111 lines
RE: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note	Susann Vihma	Thu, 18 May 2000 10:28:13 +0300 (EET DST)	126 lines
RE: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note	Susann Vihma	Thu, 18 May 2000 10:30:24 +0300 (EET DST)	132 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Adrian Bowyer	Thu, 18 May 2000 13:52:45 +0100	46 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/Terrence Love	Lubomir S. Popov	Thu, 18 May 2000 11:05:51 -0400	123 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Lubomir S. Popov	Thu, 18 May 2000 11:07:51 -0400	55 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	<>	Thu, 18 May 2000 11:08:56 EDT	53 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/	Dr. Terence Love	Thu, 18 May 2000 19:25:00	123 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	J Oliver	Thu, 18 May 2000 21:28:34 +0100	72 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Adrian Bowyer	Fri, 19 May 2000 09:28:56 +0100	48 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Adrian Bowyer	Fri, 19 May 2000 09:30:10 +0100	33 lines
Grand Designs	Lloyd.P	Fri, 19 May 2000 11:02:38 +0100	61 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Ozlem Er	Fri, 19 May 2000 14:25:36 +0300 (EEST)	57 lines
Vacancy for a Fulltime Professor of Design Methodology	Lloyd.P	Fri, 19 May 2000 15:33:09 +0200	163 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	<>	Fri, 19 May 2000 11:16:08 EDT	43 lines
Dr. Love's design research program re-stated	aguas	Fri, 19 May 2000 08:26:20 -0700	93 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	J Oliver	Fri, 19 May 2000 21:02:21 +0100	62 lines
Fwd: Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	<>	Fri, 19 May 2000 16:23:26 EDT	70 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Klaus Krippendorff	Sat, 20 May 2000 01:01:40 -0400	233 lines
Re: a more ambitious justification of design?	Paul Murty	Sun, 21 May 2000 15:24:08 +1000	58 lines
Acrobat pdf for research documents	(Chris RUST(SCS))	Mon, 22 May 2000 10:03:41 +0100	45 lines
design inquiry	Anthony Dunne	Mon, 22 May 2000 17:30:28 +0100	63 lines
Comments on an anti-disciplinary program based on design practice	aguas	Mon, 22 May 2000 10:11:59 -0700	429 lines
Dr. Love's design research program re-stated	John Wood	Mon, 22 May 2000 18:15:00 +0000	119 lines
Re: Comments on an anti-disciplinary program based on design practice	<>	Mon, 22 May 2000 16:52:48 EDT	19 lines
Clarification for note on Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Ken Friedman	Mon, 22 May 2000 23:12:11 +0200	270 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	Tim Smithers	Tue, 23 May 2000 00:22:16 +0200	118 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	Tim Smithers	Tue, 23 May 2000 00:22:16 +0200	118 lines
Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Sid Newton	Mon, 22 May 2000 15:46:57 -0700	259 lines
Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Dr. Terence Love	Mon, 22 May 2000 23:35:00	91 lines
Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry ...	Tim Smithers	Tue, 23 May 2000 01:52:40 +0200	108 lines
Percieved attributes..	Tina K. Andersen	Tue, 23 May 2000 10:02:17 +0200	24 lines
Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry ...	Simeon J. Simoff	Tue, 23 May 2000 18:56:52 +1000	22 lines
RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	Alec Robertson	Tue, 23 May 2000 10:03:41 +0100	201 lines
(pas d'objet)	Bouchaib Bahli	Tue, 23 May 2000 09:36:42 -0400	17 lines
re: Design inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Dr. Terence Love	Tue, 23 May 2000 13:39:00	162 lines
Re: Grand Designs	Nigel Cross	Tue, 23 May 2000 15:30:09 +0100	59 lines
Re: Grand Designs	Adrian Bowyer	Tue, 23 May 2000 16:22:46 +0100	64 lines
re: Design inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Sid Newton	Tue, 23 May 2000 10:56:54 -0700	302 lines
Design inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Sid Newton	Tue, 23 May 2000 11:16:12 -0700	203 lines
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. [Beryl's Challenge]	Ken Friedman	Tue, 23 May 2000 20:45:19 +0200	295 lines
A short response to John Wood's latest note ...	Ken Friedman	Tue, 23 May 2000 21:16:19 +0200	90 lines
re: Design inquiry versus Scientific iInquiry	Sid Newton	Tue, 23 May 2000 12:26:31 -0700	474 lines
Grand Designs	John Wood	Tue, 23 May 2000 19:43:41 +0000	83 lines
Re: Grand Designs	Lubomir S. Popov	Tue, 23 May 2000 15:51:59 -0400	43 lines
Re: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	<>	Tue, 23 May 2000 22:42:52 EDT	104 lines
Practice based Research	Prof Brian Allison	Wed, 24 May 2000 11:13:14 +0700	101 lines
Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Dr Keith Russell	Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:25 +1000	93 lines
Summary of The Milano conference "Design Plus Research"	Ken Friedman	Wed, 24 May 2000 13:32:42 +0200	127 lines
Philosophy for/of design	John Wood	Wed, 24 May 2000 15:14:06 +0000	67 lines
The sanctity of philosophy and other issues ... [Response to John Wood]	Ken Friedman	Wed, 24 May 2000 19:17:35 +0200	167 lines
re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Sid Newton	Wed, 24 May 2000 12:32:28 -0700	471 lines
Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ...	Ken Friedman	Thu, 25 May 2000 00:15:50 +0200	26 lines
Re: Clarification for note on Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry	Klaus Krippendorff	Thu, 25 May 2000 05:57:28 -0400	285 lines
Fwd: Re: Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ...	(Tom FISHER(SCS))	Thu, 25 May 2000 11:32:38 +0100	52 lines
Fwd: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...	<>	Thu, 25 May 2000 09:03:22 EDT	147 lines
Against Rigour	John Wood	Thu, 25 May 2000 14:23:23 +0000	64 lines
Sympathy for us devils	aguas	Thu, 25 May 2000 10:28:21 -0700	297 lines
Misplaced Arguments	Ken Friedman	Fri, 26 May 2000 00:07:35 +0200	288 lines
Examples of research through practice	(Chris RUST(SCS))	Fri, 26 May 2000 16:23:11 +0100	41 lines
3 small points amounting to a plea	(Chris RUST(SCS))	Fri, 26 May 2000 17:22:43 +0100	73 lines
A clarification on my response to John Wood.	Ken Friedman	Fri, 26 May 2000 22:08:47 +0200	78 lines
Four questions to John Wood remain open	Ken Friedman	Sun, 28 May 2000 15:55:33 +0200	201 lines
Beryl's Challenge, Part 2, section 1. [Long post. Detailed analysis and description]	Ken Friedman	Mon, 29 May 2000 23:42:54 +0200	976 lines
RE: Four questions to John Wood remain open	Klaus Krippendorff	Mon, 29 May 2000 18:45:02 -0400	103 lines
Prelude to summary	Ken Friedman	Tue, 30 May 2000 13:23:40 +0200	68 lines
Clarification to Ken's points	John Wood	Tue, 30 May 2000 11:44:28 +0000	228 lines
Conference website	Cal Swann	Tue, 30 May 2000 20:59:55 +0800	574 lines
Ken's Points	<>	Tue, 30 May 2000 11:11:16 EDT	63 lines
Re: Clarification to Ken's points	Lubomir S. Popov	Tue, 30 May 2000 12:47:47 -0400	248 lines
RE: Clarification to Ken's points	Klaus Krippendorff	Tue, 30 May 2000 12:56:55 -0400	372 lines
RE: Ken's Points	Klaus Krippendorff	Tue, 30 May 2000 13:14:21 -0400	122 lines
Re: Prelude to summary+clarifications+12 principles	Lubomir S. Popov	Tue, 30 May 2000 17:38:51 -0400	106 lines
Re: New Foundations for Design Research	(Chris RUST(SCS))	Wed, 31 May 2000 08:19:49 +0100	46 lines
Re: New Foundations for Design Research	<>	Wed, 31 May 2000 03:28:30 EDT	39 lines
The Beryl Graham Challenge	Ken Friedman	Wed, 31 May 2000 12:02:59 +0200	54 lines
RE: New Foundations for Design Research	Alec Robertson	Wed, 31 May 2000 13:25:07 +0100	93 lines
New Foundations for Design Research	Dr. Terence Love	Wed, 31 May 2000 13:58:00	124 lines
RE: Ken's Points ...	Tim Smithers	Wed, 31 May 2000 16:04:18 +0200	62 lines
Notes on Rob's and Klaus's Clarifications to Ken's Points	Ken Friedman	Wed, 31 May 2000 16:54:33 +0200	522 lines

DRS Archives

May 2000

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives